Recycling of Waste: Competition and Extended Producer Responsibility Induced Vertical Integration

Abstract We develop a two-period model of a vertically related market with two firms and a recycler. The manufacturer can restrict recycler’s capacity by lowering output, since the recycler uses its scrap to compete in the input market. We assume the recycler is more efficient, producing at lower unit cost. Market outcomes depend on the recycler’s collection rate and relative efficiency. If the collection rate is high and efficiency advantage is moderate, an unconstrained equilibrium arises where the recycler operates at optimal capacity; otherwise, constrained equilibrium prevails. Welfare outcomes differ accordingly. With low efficiency, partial recycling, which allows the recycler to produce freely, maximizes welfare. With very high efficiency, however, complete recycling is optimal. Vertical integration between the final good producer and recycler is not chosen voluntarily. Extended producer responsibility–induced integration is optimal only under constrained equilibrium with low recycling rate, or under unconstrained equilibrium with moderate efficiency. The results are also robust to alternative modes of competition and contract structures.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The B E Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy
Published
2026-05-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1515/bejeap-2025-0343
Primary Topic
Sustainable Supply Chain Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Recycling of Waste: Competition and Extended Producer Responsibility Induced Vertical Integration

Rajit Biswas, Neelanjan Sen, Muskaan Ahlawat
The B E Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy
Sustainable Supply Chain Management
article

Recycling of Waste: Competition and Extended Producer Responsibility Induced Vertical Integration

Rajit Biswas, Neelanjan Sen, Muskaan Ahlawat
article en

Abstract

Abstract We develop a two-period model of a vertically related market with two firms and a recycler. The manufacturer can restrict recycler’s capacity by lowering output, since the recycler uses its scrap to compete in the input market. We assume the recycler is more efficient, producing at lower unit cost. Market outcomes depend on the recycler’s collection rate and relative efficiency. If the collection rate is high and efficiency advantage is moderate, an unconstrained equilibrium arises where the recycler operates at optimal capacity; otherwise, constrained equilibrium prevails. Welfare outcomes differ accordingly. With low efficiency, partial recycling, which allows the recycler to produce freely, maximizes welfare. With very high efficiency, however, complete recycling is optimal. Vertical integration between the final good producer and recycler is not chosen voluntarily. Extended producer responsibility–induced integration is optimal only under constrained equilibrium with low recycling rate, or under unconstrained equilibrium with moderate efficiency. The results are also robust to alternative modes of competition and contract structures.

The B E Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy
Centre For Development Studies (IN), University of Madras (IN), Madras Institute of Development Studies (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Sustainable Supply Chain Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.