Pan-cancer landscape of oncogenic POLE and POLD1 alterations.

2650 Background: POLE and POLD1 encode key enzymes for DNA proofreading. Oncogenic alterations in POLE and POLD1 associated with defective proofreading can lead to tumor hypermutation and increased sensitivity to immune checkpoint inhibition. Prior studies have identified enrichment of POLE and POLD1 alterations in colorectal and endometrial cancers. However, characterization of POLE and POLD1 alterations in the pan-cancer setting has been limited. Utilizing the American Association for Cancer Research (AACR) Project Genomics Evidence Neoplasia Information Exchange (GENIE) v19.0, we performed a comprehensive analysis of oncogenic POLE and POLD1 alterations across tumor types. Methods: The AACR GENIE v19.0 database was used to select tumor samples that were profiled for molecular alterations (somatic mutations, structural variants, copy number alterations) in POLE or POLD1. POLE and POLD1 alterations were annotated by OncoKB to determine if they were oncogenic. Tumor samples were analyzed for co-occurring molecular alterations. Categorical variables were compared using chi-square or Fisher exact tests, as appropriate. P-values were adjusted with Benjamini-Hochberg correction to control false discovery rate (significance for q<0.05). Results: Across 188,863 tumor samples that were profiled for POLE or POLD1, there were known oncogenic alterations in 786 samples (0.4%). Of note, there were 18,170 molecular alterations in POLE and POLD1 that were classified as variants of unknown significance at time of analysis. The most common tumor types with oncogenic alterations were endometrial (n=374 of 7573 samples profiled; 4.9%), colorectal (143/17821; 0.8%), glioma (49/12795; 0.4%), NSCLC (35/30542; 0.1%), ovarian (26/7728; 0.3%), breast (25/16813; 0.2%), bladder (25/6433; 0.4%), cancer of unknown primary (19/6544; 0.3%), melanoma (13/7965; 0.2%), and pancreatic (10/10369; 0.1%), and esophagogastric (9/6503, 0.1%). The most common mutations in POLE were V411L, E18K, P286R, S297F, and A456P. The most common mutations in POLD1 were R1016H, R1016C, R689W, L606M, and D402N. Oncogenic alterations in POLE and POLD1 were enriched in endometrial cancer (OR 22.8; q<0.001) and colorectal cancer (OR 2.14; q<0.001), with no other tumor types showing enrichment. Within the oncogenic POLE/POLD1 cohort, the most common co-occurring molecular alterations were in PIK3CA (n=561, 71.4% in altered vs 12.9% in unaltered, q<0.001), APC (n=526, 68.7% vs 11.8%, q<0.001), ATM (n=523, 67.8% vs 7.3%, q<0.001), and PTEN (n=523, 66.5% vs 8.7%, q<0.001). Conclusions: To our knowledge, this study represents the largest molecular analysis of oncogenic POLE and POLD1 alterations in a pan-cancer setting. These findings suggest that oncogenic POLE and POLD1 alterations may be rarely identified in a broad range of tumor types. Further studies are needed to classify the functional implication of many variants of unknown significance in POLE and POLD1.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2026-05-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2026.44.16_suppl.2650
Primary Topic
Genetic factors in colorectal cancer
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Pan-cancer landscape of oncogenic POLE and POLD1 alterations.

Ryan H. Moy, Jimyung Park, Sung Joo Jang, Lawrence W. Wu
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Genetic factors in colorectal cancer
article

Pan-cancer landscape of oncogenic POLE and POLD1 alterations.

Ryan H. Moy, Jimyung Park, Sung Joo Jang, Lawrence W. Wu
article en

Abstract

2650 Background: POLE and POLD1 encode key enzymes for DNA proofreading. Oncogenic alterations in POLE and POLD1 associated with defective proofreading can lead to tumor hypermutation and increased sensitivity to immune checkpoint inhibition. Prior studies have identified enrichment of POLE and POLD1 alterations in colorectal and endometrial cancers. However, characterization of POLE and POLD1 alterations in the pan-cancer setting has been limited. Utilizing the American Association for Cancer Research (AACR) Project Genomics Evidence Neoplasia Information Exchange (GENIE) v19.0, we performed a comprehensive analysis of oncogenic POLE and POLD1 alterations across tumor types. Methods: The AACR GENIE v19.0 database was used to select tumor samples that were profiled for molecular alterations (somatic mutations, structural variants, copy number alterations) in POLE or POLD1. POLE and POLD1 alterations were annotated by OncoKB to determine if they were oncogenic. Tumor samples were analyzed for co-occurring molecular alterations. Categorical variables were compared using chi-square or Fisher exact tests, as appropriate. P-values were adjusted with Benjamini-Hochberg correction to control false discovery rate (significance for q<0.05). Results: Across 188,863 tumor samples that were profiled for POLE or POLD1, there were known oncogenic alterations in 786 samples (0.4%). Of note, there were 18,170 molecular alterations in POLE and POLD1 that were classified as variants of unknown significance at time of analysis. The most common tumor types with oncogenic alterations were endometrial (n=374 of 7573 samples profiled; 4.9%), colorectal (143/17821; 0.8%), glioma (49/12795; 0.4%), NSCLC (35/30542; 0.1%), ovarian (26/7728; 0.3%), breast (25/16813; 0.2%), bladder (25/6433; 0.4%), cancer of unknown primary (19/6544; 0.3%), melanoma (13/7965; 0.2%), and pancreatic (10/10369; 0.1%), and esophagogastric (9/6503, 0.1%). The most common mutations in POLE were V411L, E18K, P286R, S297F, and A456P. The most common mutations in POLD1 were R1016H, R1016C, R689W, L606M, and D402N. Oncogenic alterations in POLE and POLD1 were enriched in endometrial cancer (OR 22.8; q<0.001) and colorectal cancer (OR 2.14; q<0.001), with no other tumor types showing enrichment. Within the oncogenic POLE/POLD1 cohort, the most common co-occurring molecular alterations were in PIK3CA (n=561, 71.4% in altered vs 12.9% in unaltered, q<0.001), APC (n=526, 68.7% vs 11.8%, q<0.001), ATM (n=523, 67.8% vs 7.3%, q<0.001), and PTEN (n=523, 66.5% vs 8.7%, q<0.001). Conclusions: To our knowledge, this study represents the largest molecular analysis of oncogenic POLE and POLD1 alterations in a pan-cancer setting. These findings suggest that oncogenic POLE and POLD1 alterations may be rarely identified in a broad range of tumor types. Further studies are needed to classify the functional implication of many variants of unknown significance in POLE and POLD1.

Journal of Clinical OncologyVol. 44(16_suppl)
Columbia University Irving Medical Center (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Genetic factors in colorectal cancer
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.