Assessment of CAR-T clinical trial availability and accessibility in the United States.

1558 Background: Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy has transformed outcomes in hematologic malignancies and is increasingly evaluated in solid tumors. CAR-T trials requires specialized infrastructure, potentially limiting access by geography and institutional concentration. We assessed the national distribution of CAR-T clinical trials, population distant from trial sites, and institutional clustering. Methods: All active U.S. interventional Phase I-III CAR-T trials (adult/pediatric) were identified via ClinicalTrials.gov (accessed January 2026). Trial locations were geocoded by ZIP code and linked to 2020 Census ZIP Code Tabulation Areas. Population access was defined as residence within 30 or 60 miles of a trial site using Haversine distance. Rurality (RUCA codes), income quartiles, and race/ethnicity (ACS 2023) were evaluated to assess disparities. Institutional concentration was assessed by the proportion of trial sites contributed by individual institutions. Results: Out of 264 identified trials, 189 were selected, conducted across 356 unique institutions. More than 85% of trials were early phase(Phase I–II), spanning lymphoma, myeloma, leukemia, and solid tumor indications. Access was limited. At a 30-mile radius, 43.3% of the U.S. population (~145 million individuals) lacked proximity to an active CAR-T trial site; 27.1% (~91 million) remained without access at 60 miles. Within 30 miles, lack of access affected 94.1% of rural residents, compared with substantially lower coverage in urban areas, and 63.2% of individuals in the lowest income quartile. By race and ethnicity, 37.4% of Hispanic and 32.0% of Black populations lacked access within 30 miles. These patterns were consistent when access was defined at 60 miles. Trial availability was highly centralized. The top 10 of institutions accounted for over 60% of all CAR-T trials, led by large academic centers such as City of Hope, Memorial Sloan Kettering, MD Anderson, Texas Children’s Hospital, and Stanford University. These centers are located in major metropolitan regions, resulting in dense trial availability for populations living nearby while leaving large geographic regions without access. In contrast, approximately 60% of participating institutions hosted only a single CAR-T trial, indicating limited diffusion of trial infrastructure beyond major academic hubs. Conclusions: CAR-T clinical trial access in the United States is restricted by both geographic exclusion and marked institutional concentration. As CAR-T indications expand, addressing these structural bottlenecks will be critical to improving equitable access and ensuring broader participation in cellular therapy development. Access to CAR-T clinical trials. Population Group 30 mi 60 mi Overall US Pop 43.3% 27.1% Rural Pop 94.1% 65.6% Lowest income quartile 63.2% 45.8% Hispanic 37.4% 25.9% Black 32.0% 20.1%

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2026-05-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2026.44.16_suppl.1558
Primary Topic
CAR-T cell therapy research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessment of CAR-T clinical trial availability and accessibility in the United States.

Rahul Thakur, Nikhil Chaudhary, Matthew J Cortese, Ehsan Malek et al.
Journal of Clinical Oncology
CAR-T cell therapy research
article

Assessment of CAR-T clinical trial availability and accessibility in the United States.

Rahul Thakur, Nikhil Chaudhary, Matthew J Cortese, Ehsan Malek, Sandhya Mishra, Shernan G. Holtan, Marco Davila, Brian Betts, Xiaoyi Zhang
article en

Abstract

1558 Background: Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy has transformed outcomes in hematologic malignancies and is increasingly evaluated in solid tumors. CAR-T trials requires specialized infrastructure, potentially limiting access by geography and institutional concentration. We assessed the national distribution of CAR-T clinical trials, population distant from trial sites, and institutional clustering. Methods: All active U.S. interventional Phase I-III CAR-T trials (adult/pediatric) were identified via ClinicalTrials.gov (accessed January 2026). Trial locations were geocoded by ZIP code and linked to 2020 Census ZIP Code Tabulation Areas. Population access was defined as residence within 30 or 60 miles of a trial site using Haversine distance. Rurality (RUCA codes), income quartiles, and race/ethnicity (ACS 2023) were evaluated to assess disparities. Institutional concentration was assessed by the proportion of trial sites contributed by individual institutions. Results: Out of 264 identified trials, 189 were selected, conducted across 356 unique institutions. More than 85% of trials were early phase(Phase I–II), spanning lymphoma, myeloma, leukemia, and solid tumor indications. Access was limited. At a 30-mile radius, 43.3% of the U.S. population (~145 million individuals) lacked proximity to an active CAR-T trial site; 27.1% (~91 million) remained without access at 60 miles. Within 30 miles, lack of access affected 94.1% of rural residents, compared with substantially lower coverage in urban areas, and 63.2% of individuals in the lowest income quartile. By race and ethnicity, 37.4% of Hispanic and 32.0% of Black populations lacked access within 30 miles. These patterns were consistent when access was defined at 60 miles. Trial availability was highly centralized. The top 10 of institutions accounted for over 60% of all CAR-T trials, led by large academic centers such as City of Hope, Memorial Sloan Kettering, MD Anderson, Texas Children’s Hospital, and Stanford University. These centers are located in major metropolitan regions, resulting in dense trial availability for populations living nearby while leaving large geographic regions without access. In contrast, approximately 60% of participating institutions hosted only a single CAR-T trial, indicating limited diffusion of trial infrastructure beyond major academic hubs. Conclusions: CAR-T clinical trial access in the United States is restricted by both geographic exclusion and marked institutional concentration. As CAR-T indications expand, addressing these structural bottlenecks will be critical to improving equitable access and ensuring broader participation in cellular therapy development. Access to CAR-T clinical trials. Population Group 30 mi 60 mi Overall US Pop 43.3% 27.1% Rural Pop 94.1% 65.6% Lowest income quartile 63.2% 45.8% Hispanic 37.4% 25.9% Black 32.0% 20.1%

Journal of Clinical OncologyVol. 44(16_suppl)
Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center (US), Albert Einstein College of Medicine (US), South Dakota State University (US), Jacobi Medical Center (US), University at Buffalo, State University of New York (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
CAR-T cell therapy research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.