Economic evaluation of a designated oncology pharmacist in hemato-oncology outpatient care: A randomized clinical trial.

11063 Background: Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) and medication errors are major contributors to morbidity and healthcare utilization in hemato-oncology. In a randomized clinical trial, we previously demonstrated that integrating a designated oncology pharmacist significantly reduced ADRs and intercepted potentially serious medication errors. The economic value of this intervention has not yet been established. Methods: We conducted a trial-based cost-effectiveness analysis alongside a single-center randomized clinical trial (n=182), in which adult patients with hematologic malignancies were randomized 1:1 to comprehensive pharmaceutical care delivered by a designated oncology pharmacist versus standard care. Patients were followed for 5 months (4-month intervention plus 1-month follow-up). The primary economic outcome was incremental cost per ADR avoided; secondary outcomes included cost per emergency department visit and hospitalization avoided. The analysis was conducted from the public healthcare system perspective and included only the pharmacist program cost, estimated at $105 per patient over the 5-month study period. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were calculated using absolute risk reduction, with uncertainty assessed by nonparametric bootstrap resampling (5,000 replications). Costs are reported in 2022 USD. Results: ADRs occurred in 47.3% of control patients compared with 23.1% of intervention patients, corresponding to an absolute risk reduction of 24.2% and a number needed to treat of 4.1. The ICER was $434 per ADR avoided (bootstrap 95% CI: $281–$956), with a >99.9% probability that the intervention reduced ADRs. Secondary outcomes also favored the intervention: emergency department visits (37.4% vs 28.6%; ICER $1,194 per visit avoided) and hospitalizations (28.6% vs 23.1%; ICER $1,911 per hospitalization avoided). In addition, the pharmacist intercepted 287 medication errors in real time, including 13 potentially severe errors, with a physician acceptance rate of 94.8%. Conclusions: This economic evaluation demonstrates that integrating a designated oncology pharmacist in hemato-oncology outpatient care is a cost-effective strategy for preventing ADRs and reducing acute healthcare utilization. These findings support broader implementation of oncology pharmacists as a high-value patient safety intervention.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2026-05-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2026.44.16_suppl.11063
Primary Topic
Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Economic evaluation of a designated oncology pharmacist in hemato-oncology outpatient care: A randomized clinical trial.

Meir Preis, Mouna Ballan Haj, Shai Cohen, Manfred S. Green et al.
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
article

Economic evaluation of a designated oncology pharmacist in hemato-oncology outpatient care: A randomized clinical trial.

Meir Preis, Mouna Ballan Haj, Shai Cohen, Manfred S. Green, S Klang, Areen Khateeb Alabbasi, Shuli Z. Brammli-Greenberg
article en

Abstract

11063 Background: Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) and medication errors are major contributors to morbidity and healthcare utilization in hemato-oncology. In a randomized clinical trial, we previously demonstrated that integrating a designated oncology pharmacist significantly reduced ADRs and intercepted potentially serious medication errors. The economic value of this intervention has not yet been established. Methods: We conducted a trial-based cost-effectiveness analysis alongside a single-center randomized clinical trial (n=182), in which adult patients with hematologic malignancies were randomized 1:1 to comprehensive pharmaceutical care delivered by a designated oncology pharmacist versus standard care. Patients were followed for 5 months (4-month intervention plus 1-month follow-up). The primary economic outcome was incremental cost per ADR avoided; secondary outcomes included cost per emergency department visit and hospitalization avoided. The analysis was conducted from the public healthcare system perspective and included only the pharmacist program cost, estimated at $105 per patient over the 5-month study period. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were calculated using absolute risk reduction, with uncertainty assessed by nonparametric bootstrap resampling (5,000 replications). Costs are reported in 2022 USD. Results: ADRs occurred in 47.3% of control patients compared with 23.1% of intervention patients, corresponding to an absolute risk reduction of 24.2% and a number needed to treat of 4.1. The ICER was $434 per ADR avoided (bootstrap 95% CI: $281–$956), with a >99.9% probability that the intervention reduced ADRs. Secondary outcomes also favored the intervention: emergency department visits (37.4% vs 28.6%; ICER $1,194 per visit avoided) and hospitalizations (28.6% vs 23.1%; ICER $1,911 per hospitalization avoided). In addition, the pharmacist intercepted 287 medication errors in real time, including 13 potentially severe errors, with a physician acceptance rate of 94.8%. Conclusions: This economic evaluation demonstrates that integrating a designated oncology pharmacist in hemato-oncology outpatient care is a cost-effective strategy for preventing ADRs and reducing acute healthcare utilization. These findings support broader implementation of oncology pharmacists as a high-value patient safety intervention.

Journal of Clinical OncologyVol. 44(16_suppl)
Technion – Israel Institute of Technology (IL), Hebrew University of Jerusalem (IL), Carmel Medical Center (IL), Clalit Health Services (IL), University of Haifa (IL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.