Status and key determinants of integrated farming systems in coastal regions of eastern India: a comparative assessment

Coastal agriculture in India, where it serves as an important economic pillar, operates under escalating climate variability, fragmented landholdings, and risks in marketing and socio-economic conditions. Integrated farming systems (IFS) provide a system-based approach for smallholder farmers to improve resource-use efficiency, diversify income streams, and become more resilient to climatic conditions and other forms of risk. This study outlines the current status and determinants of IFS adoption in coastal Odisha using primary data gathered from 208 farm respondents selected through a multi-stage random sampling design across three coastal districts during 2020–2023. Principal Component Analysis included nine socio-economic variables that were used to describe five latent components that explained 86.67% of the cumulative variance. Probit regression analysis (McFadden’s pseudo-R2 = 0.712; 95.95% correctly classified) indicates that access to institutional credit (marginal effect = 0.286), education (0.174), market connectivity (0.213), labour availability, and family type significantly increase the adoption probability (p < 0.05), whereas age and operational landholding exert negative effects. Economic comparison revealed significant differences in gross income among farming systems for marginal farmers (F = 124.63, p < 0.01) and medium farmers (F = 9.89, p < 0.01), and in variable costs for marginal farmers (F = 247.57, p < 0.01) and small farmers (F = 15.56, p < 0.01). Tukey’s post-hoc analysis further confirmed relative economic differentiation among farming system models. The Crop–Livestock–Pisciculture–Resource Generating (vermicompost and FYM)–Mushroom model, integrated for additional income generation and resource recycling, demonstrated the highest economic performance, whereas Crop–Livestock systems were more suitable for smaller holdings. The findings underscore the need for targeted credit mechanisms, specially designed location specific extension services, and promoting region-specific IFS models aligned with agro-ecological conditions and farm-size categories for enhancing livelihood resilience and aligning with broader sustainability targets.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2026-05-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-49440-z
Primary Topic
Agricultural Systems and Practices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Status and key determinants of integrated farming systems in coastal regions of eastern India: a comparative assessment

Kamlesh Kumar Acharya, Pedda Ghouse Peera Sheikh Kulsum, Himansu Sekhar Gouda, Arati Priyadarshini et al.
Scientific Reports
Agricultural Systems and Practices
article

Status and key determinants of integrated farming systems in coastal regions of eastern India: a comparative assessment

Kamlesh Kumar Acharya, Pedda Ghouse Peera Sheikh Kulsum, Himansu Sekhar Gouda, Arati Priyadarshini, Abhiram Dash, Utpal Das, Khitish Kumar Sarangi, Ashis Ranjan Udgata, Anmol Panda, Subrat Pattanaik
article en

Abstract

Coastal agriculture in India, where it serves as an important economic pillar, operates under escalating climate variability, fragmented landholdings, and risks in marketing and socio-economic conditions. Integrated farming systems (IFS) provide a system-based approach for smallholder farmers to improve resource-use efficiency, diversify income streams, and become more resilient to climatic conditions and other forms of risk. This study outlines the current status and determinants of IFS adoption in coastal Odisha using primary data gathered from 208 farm respondents selected through a multi-stage random sampling design across three coastal districts during 2020–2023. Principal Component Analysis included nine socio-economic variables that were used to describe five latent components that explained 86.67% of the cumulative variance. Probit regression analysis (McFadden’s pseudo-R2 = 0.712; 95.95% correctly classified) indicates that access to institutional credit (marginal effect = 0.286), education (0.174), market connectivity (0.213), labour availability, and family type significantly increase the adoption probability (p < 0.05), whereas age and operational landholding exert negative effects. Economic comparison revealed significant differences in gross income among farming systems for marginal farmers (F = 124.63, p < 0.01) and medium farmers (F = 9.89, p < 0.01), and in variable costs for marginal farmers (F = 247.57, p < 0.01) and small farmers (F = 15.56, p < 0.01). Tukey’s post-hoc analysis further confirmed relative economic differentiation among farming system models. The Crop–Livestock–Pisciculture–Resource Generating (vermicompost and FYM)–Mushroom model, integrated for additional income generation and resource recycling, demonstrated the highest economic performance, whereas Crop–Livestock systems were more suitable for smaller holdings. The findings underscore the need for targeted credit mechanisms, specially designed location specific extension services, and promoting region-specific IFS models aligned with agro-ecological conditions and farm-size categories for enhancing livelihood resilience and aligning with broader sustainability targets.

Scientific Reports
Odisha University of Agriculture and Technology (IN), Indian Institute of Pulses Research (IN), Sri Sri University (IN), Institute of Agricultural Economics (BG), GIET University (IN), Vellore Institute of Technology University (IN)
VIT University
Life below water
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Agricultural Systems and Practices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.