Debriefing in practice: a cross-sectional observational study of self-reflection competence, psychological safety and speak-up in paramedic training

BACKGROUND: Debriefing is a central component of workplace-based learning in the training of paramedics. While their effects are well documented in simulation and hospital settings, little is known about how debriefing quality, psychological safety, speak-up behaviour, and self-reflection competence are interrelated in real-world emergency medical service settings. The aim of this study was to investigate these relationships and analyze potential differences between paramedic trainees and paramedic field instructors. METHODS: A cross-sectional observational study was conducted using a standardized online survey tool (July-November 2025). The study aimed to assess psychological safety, speak-up behaviour, perceived debriefing quality, and self-reflection competence. Data were analyzed descriptively and using group-specific Pearson correlations. RESULTS: A total of 177 participants, including 61 paramedic field instructors and 116 trainees, were analyzed. Trainees and paramedic field instructors differed significantly with regard to debriefing quality (p < .001) and self-reflection competence (p < .05), while no significant differences were observed for psychological safety or speak-up. Among paramedic field instructors, self-reflection competence correlated strongly with debriefing quality (r = .67; p < .001). Among trainees, the strongest correlation was found between psychological safety and debriefing quality (r = .61; p < .001). Psychological safety was significantly associated with utilization of speak-up in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Debriefing should not be considered merely as retrospective discussions, but rather as learning environments that are intentionally designed. The findings suggest that debriefing quality is closely associated with reflective facilitation and a psychologically safe environment, particularly for trainees. The training of on-the-job instructors should therefore specifically address, in addition to methodological facilitation skills, the design of interactions that promote reflection and foster a sense of safety, in order to sustainably improve learning, speak-up culture, and team communication. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study is registered in "Deutsches Register Klinischer Studien" (DRKS-ID: DRKS00037257, Registration Date: 03.07.2025).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Medical Education
Published
2026-05-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-026-09502-2
Primary Topic
Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Debriefing in practice: a cross-sectional observational study of self-reflection competence, psychological safety and speak-up in paramedic training

Nele Sommer, Hartwig Marung, Matthias Raspe, Reinhard Strametz
BMC Medical Education
Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare
article

Debriefing in practice: a cross-sectional observational study of self-reflection competence, psychological safety and speak-up in paramedic training

Nele Sommer, Hartwig Marung, Matthias Raspe, Reinhard Strametz
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Debriefing is a central component of workplace-based learning in the training of paramedics. While their effects are well documented in simulation and hospital settings, little is known about how debriefing quality, psychological safety, speak-up behaviour, and self-reflection competence are interrelated in real-world emergency medical service settings. The aim of this study was to investigate these relationships and analyze potential differences between paramedic trainees and paramedic field instructors. METHODS: A cross-sectional observational study was conducted using a standardized online survey tool (July-November 2025). The study aimed to assess psychological safety, speak-up behaviour, perceived debriefing quality, and self-reflection competence. Data were analyzed descriptively and using group-specific Pearson correlations. RESULTS: A total of 177 participants, including 61 paramedic field instructors and 116 trainees, were analyzed. Trainees and paramedic field instructors differed significantly with regard to debriefing quality (p < .001) and self-reflection competence (p < .05), while no significant differences were observed for psychological safety or speak-up. Among paramedic field instructors, self-reflection competence correlated strongly with debriefing quality (r = .67; p < .001). Among trainees, the strongest correlation was found between psychological safety and debriefing quality (r = .61; p < .001). Psychological safety was significantly associated with utilization of speak-up in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Debriefing should not be considered merely as retrospective discussions, but rather as learning environments that are intentionally designed. The findings suggest that debriefing quality is closely associated with reflective facilitation and a psychologically safe environment, particularly for trainees. The training of on-the-job instructors should therefore specifically address, in addition to methodological facilitation skills, the design of interactions that promote reflection and foster a sense of safety, in order to sustainably improve learning, speak-up culture, and team communication. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study is registered in "Deutsches Register Klinischer Studien" (DRKS-ID: DRKS00037257, Registration Date: 03.07.2025).

BMC Medical EducationVol. 26(1)
Goethe University Frankfurt (DE), Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin (DE), Klinikum Bielefeld (DE), University of Lübeck (DE)
Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.