Assessing greenhouse gas measurement consistency and traceability in the UK and Ireland atmospheric monitoring network using whole and synthetic air reference materials

Abstract. Atmospheric greenhouse gas (GHG) measurements are essential for assessing climate change and verifying national emission inventories. As global networks rely on high-precision observations of potent GHGs such as carbon dioxide (CO₂), methane (CH₄) and nitrous oxide (N₂O), ensuring accuracy between observation stations is essential. Maintaining accuracy within a network requires the use of whole air reference materials (RMs) with well-defined calibration scales, such as those maintained by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) for the World Meteorological Organisation (WMO). With the global expansion of atmospheric monitoring networks there is a growing need for readily available RMs, stimulating the development of complementary alternatives such as synthetic air RMs traceable to the International System of Units (SI). In the United Kingdom (UK) and Ireland, the atmospheric GHG monitoring network, comprising long-term atmospheric monitoring stations, is equipped with high precision in situ GHG analysers. These observations are used to verify bottom-up assessments of national emissions. Here, a case study is presented which provides the first direct, network‑wide evaluation of whole air versus synthetic air RMs under routine field conditions, allowing an assessment of the implications of SI‑traceable RMs within an active national atmospheric monitoring system. We assess the UK and Ireland’s network accuracy using WMO-NOAA scale-traceable whole air RMs and SI-traceable synthetic air RMs, through a blind multi-site round-robin intercomparison. Between 2021 and 2022, measurements were made of CO2, CH4 and N2O in whole and synthetic air RMs at six sites using a range of instruments and the results were used to assess biases between sites. The measured mole fractions for each cylinder, at each site were then compared with the assigned value on the WMO-NOAA scale and the SI-traceable values for the whole air and synthetic air RMs, respectively. Weighted residual analysis reveals that whole air RMs generally meet the WMO/Global Atmospheric Watch (GAW) compatibility goals for CO₂ and CH₄, while N₂O remains more difficult due to its small atmospheric variability and instrument performance. Synthetic SI-traceable RMs have associated absolute uncertainties on their assigned values for CH4 that are comparable to the extended WMO compatibility goals. However, absolute uncertainties for CO2 and N2O remain significantly larger than both the compatibility and extended compatibility goals, which is consistent with previous studies. Overall, these results indicate that while scale-traceable whole air RMs remain essential for achieving the highest level of network compatibility required for atmospheric monitoring, SI-traceable synthetic RMs could play a valuable complementary role, particularly for CH4. However, it is first critical that improved characterisation of matrix effects, mole fraction dependant instrument responses, and long-term stability, are achieved for them to become suitable for high-precision atmospheric monitoring.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Atmospheric measurement techniques
Published
2026-11-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-19-6921-2026
Primary Topic
Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessing greenhouse gas measurement consistency and traceability in the UK and Ireland atmospheric monitoring network using whole and synthetic air reference materials

Morgan Lopez, Grant Leonard Forster, T. Gerard Spain, Michel Ramonet et al.
1 links
Atmospheric measurement techniques
Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
article

Assessing greenhouse gas measurement consistency and traceability in the UK and Ireland atmospheric monitoring network using whole and synthetic air reference materials

Morgan Lopez, Grant Leonard Forster, T. Gerard Spain, Michel Ramonet, Chris Rennick, Damien Martin, Joseph Pitt, Dickon Young, Dafina Kikaj, Kanokrat Charoenpornpukdee, Emmal Safi, Simon O’Doherty, Andrew C. Manning, Kieran Stanely, Nick Garrard
article en

Abstract

Abstract. Atmospheric greenhouse gas (GHG) measurements are essential for assessing climate change and verifying national emission inventories. As global networks rely on high-precision observations of potent GHGs such as carbon dioxide (CO₂), methane (CH₄) and nitrous oxide (N₂O), ensuring accuracy between observation stations is essential. Maintaining accuracy within a network requires the use of whole air reference materials (RMs) with well-defined calibration scales, such as those maintained by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) for the World Meteorological Organisation (WMO). With the global expansion of atmospheric monitoring networks there is a growing need for readily available RMs, stimulating the development of complementary alternatives such as synthetic air RMs traceable to the International System of Units (SI). In the United Kingdom (UK) and Ireland, the atmospheric GHG monitoring network, comprising long-term atmospheric monitoring stations, is equipped with high precision in situ GHG analysers. These observations are used to verify bottom-up assessments of national emissions. Here, a case study is presented which provides the first direct, network‑wide evaluation of whole air versus synthetic air RMs under routine field conditions, allowing an assessment of the implications of SI‑traceable RMs within an active national atmospheric monitoring system. We assess the UK and Ireland’s network accuracy using WMO-NOAA scale-traceable whole air RMs and SI-traceable synthetic air RMs, through a blind multi-site round-robin intercomparison. Between 2021 and 2022, measurements were made of CO2, CH4 and N2O in whole and synthetic air RMs at six sites using a range of instruments and the results were used to assess biases between sites. The measured mole fractions for each cylinder, at each site were then compared with the assigned value on the WMO-NOAA scale and the SI-traceable values for the whole air and synthetic air RMs, respectively. Weighted residual analysis reveals that whole air RMs generally meet the WMO/Global Atmospheric Watch (GAW) compatibility goals for CO₂ and CH₄, while N₂O remains more difficult due to its small atmospheric variability and instrument performance. Synthetic SI-traceable RMs have associated absolute uncertainties on their assigned values for CH4 that are comparable to the extended WMO compatibility goals. However, absolute uncertainties for CO2 and N2O remain significantly larger than both the compatibility and extended compatibility goals, which is consistent with previous studies. Overall, these results indicate that while scale-traceable whole air RMs remain essential for achieving the highest level of network compatibility required for atmospheric monitoring, SI-traceable synthetic RMs could play a valuable complementary role, particularly for CH4. However, it is first critical that improved characterisation of matrix effects, mole fraction dependant instrument responses, and long-term stability, are achieved for them to become suitable for high-precision atmospheric monitoring.

Atmospheric measurement techniquesVol. 19(21)
University of East Anglia (GB), National Physical Laboratory (GB), Rochester Institute of Technology (US), Ollscoil na Gaillimhe – University of Galway (IE), Université Paris-Saclay (FR), University of Bristol (GB), National Centre for Atmospheric Science (GB), Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l'Environnement (FR), National Institute of Metrology (Thailand) (TH)
Natural Environment Research Council
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon