Integrating hydrogen into Ontario’s energy hub: A robust, carbon-aware framework for power–heat–transport

Decarbonizing electricity generation, heating, and transportation simultaneously requires integrated planning tools that coordinate multiple energy carriers while remaining reliable under uncertainty. This paper develops a carbon-aware and uncertainty-resilient optimization framework for a grid-connected multi-energy hub that co-optimizes electricity, heating, cooling, and transportation services with an explicit hydrogen sub-hub. The model is formulated as a mixed-integer linear program over annual planning states from 2025 to 2050, representing 25 inter-year transition intervals. The hub integrates photovoltaic and wind generation, dispatchable natural gas-based conversion, storage, demand response, EV charging and V2G, and a storage-mediated hydrogen chain comprising an electrolyzer, hydrogen storage, FCEV demand, and stationary fuel-cell reconversion. Two policy archetypes are examined: a carbon tax, represented by an emissions-cost term in the objective, and a net-zero pathway, represented by a declining emissions constraint. Feasibility-critical operational uncertainty is treated through budgeted robust optimization with deviation bounds ± 30 % deviation bounds and a tunable uncertainty budget, applied to electricity and heat balances. Under the adopted representative-period design, the Ontario case yields an electrolyzer expansion from 300 MW in 2025 to 3800 MW in 2050, hydrogen-storage expansion from 2000 to 37,000 MWh, and a robustness premium of approximately 6.6%–9.0% in the policy cases. These numerical magnitudes are conditional on the compression of each planning year into a representative 48-hour window. Because this aggregation excludes sequences longer than that window, the 37-GWh result is not a validated seasonal-adequacy requirement and is likely downward-biased when multi-day low-renewable episodes are binding; the reported robustness premium should likewise be interpreted as conditional on the adopted temporal representation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Energy Conversion and Management
Published
2026-11-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2026.122326
Primary Topic
Integrated Energy Systems Optimization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Integrating hydrogen into Ontario’s energy hub: A robust, carbon-aware framework for power–heat–transport

Hamed Samarghandi, Hossein Mirzaee, Mostafa Mostafavi Sani
4 links
Energy Conversion and Management
Integrated Energy Systems Optimization
article

Integrating hydrogen into Ontario’s energy hub: A robust, carbon-aware framework for power–heat–transport

Hamed Samarghandi, Hossein Mirzaee, Mostafa Mostafavi Sani
article en

Abstract

Decarbonizing electricity generation, heating, and transportation simultaneously requires integrated planning tools that coordinate multiple energy carriers while remaining reliable under uncertainty. This paper develops a carbon-aware and uncertainty-resilient optimization framework for a grid-connected multi-energy hub that co-optimizes electricity, heating, cooling, and transportation services with an explicit hydrogen sub-hub. The model is formulated as a mixed-integer linear program over annual planning states from 2025 to 2050, representing 25 inter-year transition intervals. The hub integrates photovoltaic and wind generation, dispatchable natural gas-based conversion, storage, demand response, EV charging and V2G, and a storage-mediated hydrogen chain comprising an electrolyzer, hydrogen storage, FCEV demand, and stationary fuel-cell reconversion. Two policy archetypes are examined: a carbon tax, represented by an emissions-cost term in the objective, and a net-zero pathway, represented by a declining emissions constraint. Feasibility-critical operational uncertainty is treated through budgeted robust optimization with deviation bounds ± 30 % deviation bounds and a tunable uncertainty budget, applied to electricity and heat balances. Under the adopted representative-period design, the Ontario case yields an electrolyzer expansion from 300 MW in 2025 to 3800 MW in 2050, hydrogen-storage expansion from 2000 to 37,000 MWh, and a robustness premium of approximately 6.6%–9.0% in the policy cases. These numerical magnitudes are conditional on the compression of each planning year into a representative 48-hour window. Because this aggregation excludes sequences longer than that window, the 37-GWh result is not a validated seasonal-adequacy requirement and is likely downward-biased when multi-day low-renewable episodes are binding; the reported robustness premium should likewise be interpreted as conditional on the adopted temporal representation.

Energy Conversion and ManagementVol. 372
Dalhousie University (CA), University of British Columbia (CA), University of Saskatchewan (CA)
Affordable and clean energy, Industry, innovation and infrastructure, Climate action, Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Integrated Energy Systems Optimization
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon