What is driving the differential loss of skull bones throughout tetrapod evolution? Evidence from Temnospondyli

Skull simplification describes the convergent loss of bones in the tetrapod skull over evolutionary time. Much of this trend remains elusive, in particular, the apparent difference in evolutionary conservation across the skull. While some bones (e.g. nasal) have been retained for over 400 million years, others (e.g. tabular) were repeatedly lost. The drivers of this preferential loss remain unknown. We explore whether the discrepancy in evolutionary conservation in the lissamphibian lineage was related to differences in evolvability of skull bones in their stem group, the temnospondyls. Linear morphometrics were applied to temnospondyl skull roof bones to quantify and compare the morphological disparity and evolutionary rates of bones that are lost and retained by lissamphibians. Analyses were conducted at inter- and intraspecific levels to capture the effects of development and natural selection on bone disparity. Bones lost in lissamphibians exhibited greater morphological disparity and evolutionary rates in temnospondyls than retained bones. This indicates that developmental bias may have promoted the retention of conserved bones. The higher disparity and evolutionary rates in bones absent in lissamphibians suggest that they were less constrained by development, potentially facilitating their loss in response to functional demands associated with buccal-pump breathing and eye retraction during feeding.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences
Published
2026-05-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2025.3276
Primary Topic
Paleontology and Evolutionary Biology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

What is driving the differential loss of skull bones throughout tetrapod evolution? Evidence from Temnospondyli

Kim Julia Kean, Nadia B. Fröbisch, Marylène Danto, Celeste M. Pérez-Ben
Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences
Paleontology and Evolutionary Biology
article

What is driving the differential loss of skull bones throughout tetrapod evolution? Evidence from Temnospondyli

Kim Julia Kean, Nadia B. Fröbisch, Marylène Danto, Celeste M. Pérez-Ben
article en

Abstract

Skull simplification describes the convergent loss of bones in the tetrapod skull over evolutionary time. Much of this trend remains elusive, in particular, the apparent difference in evolutionary conservation across the skull. While some bones (e.g. nasal) have been retained for over 400 million years, others (e.g. tabular) were repeatedly lost. The drivers of this preferential loss remain unknown. We explore whether the discrepancy in evolutionary conservation in the lissamphibian lineage was related to differences in evolvability of skull bones in their stem group, the temnospondyls. Linear morphometrics were applied to temnospondyl skull roof bones to quantify and compare the morphological disparity and evolutionary rates of bones that are lost and retained by lissamphibians. Analyses were conducted at inter- and intraspecific levels to capture the effects of development and natural selection on bone disparity. Bones lost in lissamphibians exhibited greater morphological disparity and evolutionary rates in temnospondyls than retained bones. This indicates that developmental bias may have promoted the retention of conserved bones. The higher disparity and evolutionary rates in bones absent in lissamphibians suggest that they were less constrained by development, potentially facilitating their loss in response to functional demands associated with buccal-pump breathing and eye retraction during feeding.

Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological SciencesVol. 293(2071)
Museum für Naturkunde (DE), Universidad de Buenos Aires (AR), Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin (DE)
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Paleontology and Evolutionary Biology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.