DP-SoftShape: Adaptive Differential Privacy via Attention-Guided Sparsification for Time-Series Classification

Local Differential Privacy (LDP) is the de facto protocol for releasing time-series data under formal privacy guarantees. Existing LDP schemes typically add Laplace noise of equal scale at every time step, which tends to drown out the short discriminative patches a classifier depends on. DP-SoftShape spends ϵ unevenly across patches. An attention head scores each shape patch by its contribution to the class label and the Laplace scale at that patch is set in inverse proportion to the score, so noisier perturbation falls on flatter regions while the patches that actually carry the class signal stay close to the original embedding. A uniform-budget version of the same architecture loses most of this gain (Section 4). A Mixture-of-Experts refinement layer downstream recovers features that the noise still disturbs. On 20 UCR datasets at four privacy budgets, DP-SoftShape attains a mean accuracy of 0.722, against 0.565 for ROCKET and 0.553 for Arsenal under the same input-LDP setting.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Machine Learning and Information Security
Published
2026-05-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.53941/jmlis.2026.100009
Primary Topic
Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

DP-SoftShape: Adaptive Differential Privacy via Attention-Guided Sparsification for Time-Series Classification

Wanxin Sui, M Li, Baobing Zhang
Journal of Machine Learning and Information Security
Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
article

DP-SoftShape: Adaptive Differential Privacy via Attention-Guided Sparsification for Time-Series Classification

Wanxin Sui, M Li, Baobing Zhang
article en

Abstract

Local Differential Privacy (LDP) is the de facto protocol for releasing time-series data under formal privacy guarantees. Existing LDP schemes typically add Laplace noise of equal scale at every time step, which tends to drown out the short discriminative patches a classifier depends on. DP-SoftShape spends ϵ unevenly across patches. An attention head scores each shape patch by its contribution to the class label and the Laplace scale at that patch is set in inverse proportion to the score, so noisier perturbation falls on flatter regions while the patches that actually carry the class signal stay close to the original embedding. A uniform-budget version of the same architecture loses most of this gain (Section 4). A Mixture-of-Experts refinement layer downstream recovers features that the noise still disturbs. On 20 UCR datasets at four privacy budgets, DP-SoftShape attains a mean accuracy of 0.722, against 0.565 for ROCKET and 0.553 for Arsenal under the same input-LDP setting.

Journal of Machine Learning and Information SecurityVol. 2(2)
University of Hertfordshire (GB), Brunel University of London (GB)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

DP-SoftShape: Adaptive Differential Privacy via Attention-Guided Sparsification for Time-Series Classification — Wanxin Sui, M Li, et al. · Journal of Machine Learning and Information Security (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS