The Dual Impact of Organic Farming Support: Evaluating Greenhouse Gas Emissions Abatement and Private Payoffs

ABSTRACT This study evaluates whether financial support for organic farming under the EU Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) effectively contributes to reducing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in agriculture. Using data from a panel of Italian farms between 2015 and 2022, we examine both the private benefits (farm income) and societal outcomes (GHG emission reductions) associated with the adoption of organic practices. To account for differences in farm‐level responses, we develop an analytical framework of farmers' decision‐making and apply causal machine learning techniques that allow for heterogeneous treatment effects. Our findings reveal that while many farmers benefit economically from adopting organic farming, the impact in terms of GHG abatement is often limited. These results raise concerns about the overall effectiveness and efficiency of current CAP support and suggest directions for improving policy design.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Business Strategy and the Environment
Published
2026-06-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.71010
Primary Topic
Agricultural Economics and Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Dual Impact of Organic Farming Support: Evaluating Greenhouse Gas Emissions Abatement and Private Payoffs

Coderoni Silvia, Esposti Roberto, Varacca Alessandro
Business Strategy and the Environment
Agricultural Economics and Policy
article

The Dual Impact of Organic Farming Support: Evaluating Greenhouse Gas Emissions Abatement and Private Payoffs

Coderoni Silvia, Esposti Roberto, Varacca Alessandro
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT This study evaluates whether financial support for organic farming under the EU Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) effectively contributes to reducing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in agriculture. Using data from a panel of Italian farms between 2015 and 2022, we examine both the private benefits (farm income) and societal outcomes (GHG emission reductions) associated with the adoption of organic practices. To account for differences in farm‐level responses, we develop an analytical framework of farmers' decision‐making and apply causal machine learning techniques that allow for heterogeneous treatment effects. Our findings reveal that while many farmers benefit economically from adopting organic farming, the impact in terms of GHG abatement is often limited. These results raise concerns about the overall effectiveness and efficiency of current CAP support and suggest directions for improving policy design.

Business Strategy and the Environment
Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore (IT), Marche Polytechnic University (IT), University of Teramo (IT)
European Commission
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Agricultural Economics and Policy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.