Spatiotemporal Differentiation and Driving Mechanisms of Water Resources Carrying Capacity in the Jialu River Basin Using Combined Weighting and Geodetector

The water resources carrying capacity (WRCC) lays a foundational basis for long-term coordinated water resource governance. Based on the Driving–Pressure–State–Impact–Response (DPSIR) framework, this study constructed a WRCC evaluation system containing 21 indicators and adopted a combined weighting method integrating entropy weight and coefficient of variation. Weighted Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) and geographical detector tools were jointly applied to quantify spatial-temporal WRCC disparities within the Jialu River Basin, alongside extraction of core driving forces during 2010–2022. Marked spatial disparities existed across administrative units, with basin-average WRCC ranging from 0.18–0.35. Zhengzhou maintained relatively high carrying levels, Kaifeng stayed chronically low, Xuchang improved after 2019, while Zhoukou experienced an overall decline, forming a relatively stable spatial pattern: Zhengzhou > Zhoukou > Xuchang > Kaifeng. Socioeconomic factors stood among the major drivers of spatial divergence. R&D expenditure and urbanization rate exhibited the highest explanatory capacity, with respective q statistics of 0.58 and 0.57. In contrast, natural factors including precipitation and groundwater reserves showed limited impacts, with q values of only 0.11 and 0.09. Factor interaction analysis showed that bivariate enhancement was the primary interaction type (70.53%), followed by nonlinear enhancement (21.05%) and nonlinear weakening (8.42%). The mean q value of the interactive effects reached 0.58, which was 45.0% higher than that of individual factors, suggesting prominent multi-factor synergistic effects. These results deliver empirical evidence for differentiated watershed regulation and cross-jurisdictional water–ecological coordination, and offer actionable governance insights for densely urbanized plain tributary basins with intense human–water conflicts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Water
Published
2026-08-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/w18172111
Primary Topic
Water Resources and Sustainability
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Spatiotemporal Differentiation and Driving Mechanisms of Water Resources Carrying Capacity in the Jialu River Basin Using Combined Weighting and Geodetector

Yuanyuan Wei, Xinxin Song, Ting Gao, Yingying Zhang
Water
Water Resources and Sustainability
article

Spatiotemporal Differentiation and Driving Mechanisms of Water Resources Carrying Capacity in the Jialu River Basin Using Combined Weighting and Geodetector

Yuanyuan Wei, Xinxin Song, Ting Gao, Yingying Zhang
article en

Abstract

The water resources carrying capacity (WRCC) lays a foundational basis for long-term coordinated water resource governance. Based on the Driving–Pressure–State–Impact–Response (DPSIR) framework, this study constructed a WRCC evaluation system containing 21 indicators and adopted a combined weighting method integrating entropy weight and coefficient of variation. Weighted Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) and geographical detector tools were jointly applied to quantify spatial-temporal WRCC disparities within the Jialu River Basin, alongside extraction of core driving forces during 2010–2022. Marked spatial disparities existed across administrative units, with basin-average WRCC ranging from 0.18–0.35. Zhengzhou maintained relatively high carrying levels, Kaifeng stayed chronically low, Xuchang improved after 2019, while Zhoukou experienced an overall decline, forming a relatively stable spatial pattern: Zhengzhou > Zhoukou > Xuchang > Kaifeng. Socioeconomic factors stood among the major drivers of spatial divergence. R&D expenditure and urbanization rate exhibited the highest explanatory capacity, with respective q statistics of 0.58 and 0.57. In contrast, natural factors including precipitation and groundwater reserves showed limited impacts, with q values of only 0.11 and 0.09. Factor interaction analysis showed that bivariate enhancement was the primary interaction type (70.53%), followed by nonlinear enhancement (21.05%) and nonlinear weakening (8.42%). The mean q value of the interactive effects reached 0.58, which was 45.0% higher than that of individual factors, suggesting prominent multi-factor synergistic effects. These results deliver empirical evidence for differentiated watershed regulation and cross-jurisdictional water–ecological coordination, and offer actionable governance insights for densely urbanized plain tributary basins with intense human–water conflicts.

WaterVol. 18(17)
Henan University (CN), Zhengzhou Normal University (CN)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Water Resources and Sustainability
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.