Expansion vs. Continuous Cosmic Projection-nu-A

Expansion vs. Projection Analogy-nu.A This report proposes an alternative ontological interpretation of the Big Bang: not a completed historical event, but an ongoing process of cosmic projection from a pre-geometric origin condition (č²) into geometric reality (X²). Observable expansion is reinterpreted as the visible signature of this continuous projection, not its primary event. This version corrects earlier language describing emerged geometry as "collapsing back into" the pre-geometric source and being "reflected back" as renewed projection — language suggesting a cyclical reversal inconsistent with this framework's own locked structural claim that projection, once underway, admits no regression toward its pre-geometric origin (GTOE Whitepaper v2.3, Section 4.9). The corrected account describes projection as continuously outward-oriented and sustained without exhaustion, consistent across this work and the GTOE Whitepaper. No revision is made to the report's core interpretive claims regarding projection, distinguishability, the projection-rate boundary (c), or the treatment of classical cosmological observations, which remain fully valid and are not contested by this framework.