Reward-related memory benefits cannot be explained by post-encoding stimulus-related thought
There is an active debate regarding whether rehearsal drives memory benefits associated with awake post-encoding consolidation. In the current study, we manipulated conditions designed to encourage or discourage rehearsal during post-encoding wakeful rest to characterize downstream effects on associative memory in the context of a reward-motivated memory paradigm. To manipulate rehearsal during the post-encoding period, participants in the rehearsal group were explicitly instructed to rehearse high-reward memoranda for 15 min and then completed an incentivized mini-retrieval test. In contrast, participants in the rest group completed an incentivized mini-retrieval test immediately, eliminating the need for post-encoding rehearsal, then were instructed to rest for 15 min. A surprise memory test occurred approximately 24 h later. We found that reward significantly enhanced item memory, replicating a large body of work. Importantly, we found that neither encouraging post-encoding rehearsal nor self-reported time spent thinking about high-reward stimuli during the post-encoding period were related to reward memory enhancements. These findings suggest that explicitly encouraging rehearsal during post-encoding rest cannot fully explain consolidation-related memory benefits, consistent with the notion that spontaneous processes support reward memory benefits on long-term memory.
Authors
- Arielle Tambini (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9200-9165)
- Matthew Fain
- Vishnu P. Murty (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8928-9239)
- Emily T. Cowan (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9956-0475)
- Benjamin Chaloupka
Institutions
- Nathan Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research (US)
- University of Oregon (US)
- New York University (US)
- Adelphi University (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Scientific Reports
- Published
- 2026-11-04
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-78089-x
- Primary Topic
- Sleep and Wakefulness Research
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00