EmotionaL and Language Recovery in Aphasia (ELLA): Codesigning and Proof-of-Concept Testing a Novel Intervention

Purpose: People with aphasia are at risk of becoming depressed, anxious, and isolated. They want therapy to focus on improving communication, confidence, and finding ways to live well; family members want to be involved in the therapy process. We aimed to codesign and test a novel intervention (EmotionaL and Language recovery in Aphasia [ELLA]) that would address these priorities through integrating two evidence-based therapy approaches: elaborated semantic feature analysis (SFA), a naming therapy, and solution-focused brief therapy (SFBT), a psychological therapy. Method: A series of workshops were held with five people with aphasia (six workshops), three family members (three workshops), and four speech-language pathologists (SLPs; three workshops). In addition, meetings were held with experts in SFBT and elaborated SFA. This information was analyzed using qualitative content analysis and mapped onto a therapy manual. Advisors with aphasia ( n = 5) and student SLPs ( n = 4) trialed therapy components for further refinement prior to a proof-of-concept pre–post group study ( n = 8 participants with aphasia). The therapy was codelivered by student SLPs supervised by an experienced SLP; participants received, on average, 14.25 sessions ( SD = 2.25) over 7 weeks. The primary clinical outcome was the Communicative Participation Item Bank (CPIB); participants also took part in in-depth interviews posttherapy analyzed using framework analysis. Results: Themes from the codesign stage included the following: choosing meaningful therapy targets, integrating impairment and psychological therapy, managing endings, involving family, supporting home practice, dosage and delivery, and achieving real-life change. Participants in the proof-of-concept study made significant gains on the CPIB ( p = .006, Cohen's d = 1.37). All participants highly valued the therapeutic relationship and were positive about combining psychological and language components within the same intervention. Conclusions: ELLA has been designed as a holistic, humanistic language therapy. This study suggests that ELLA may be a promising way to enable SLPs to address both emotional and language recovery.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology
Published
2026-08-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1044/2026_ajslp-25-00479
Primary Topic
Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

EmotionaL and Language Recovery in Aphasia (ELLA): Codesigning and Proof-of-Concept Testing a Novel Intervention

S. Northcott, N. Behn, K. Hilari, L. Sockett et al.
American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology
Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
article

EmotionaL and Language Recovery in Aphasia (ELLA): Codesigning and Proof-of-Concept Testing a Novel Intervention

S. Northcott, N. Behn, K. Hilari, L. Sockett, M. Wickham, N. Devane, S. Thomas, A. Morris
article en

Abstract

Purpose: People with aphasia are at risk of becoming depressed, anxious, and isolated. They want therapy to focus on improving communication, confidence, and finding ways to live well; family members want to be involved in the therapy process. We aimed to codesign and test a novel intervention (EmotionaL and Language recovery in Aphasia [ELLA]) that would address these priorities through integrating two evidence-based therapy approaches: elaborated semantic feature analysis (SFA), a naming therapy, and solution-focused brief therapy (SFBT), a psychological therapy. Method: A series of workshops were held with five people with aphasia (six workshops), three family members (three workshops), and four speech-language pathologists (SLPs; three workshops). In addition, meetings were held with experts in SFBT and elaborated SFA. This information was analyzed using qualitative content analysis and mapped onto a therapy manual. Advisors with aphasia ( n = 5) and student SLPs ( n = 4) trialed therapy components for further refinement prior to a proof-of-concept pre–post group study ( n = 8 participants with aphasia). The therapy was codelivered by student SLPs supervised by an experienced SLP; participants received, on average, 14.25 sessions ( SD = 2.25) over 7 weeks. The primary clinical outcome was the Communicative Participation Item Bank (CPIB); participants also took part in in-depth interviews posttherapy analyzed using framework analysis. Results: Themes from the codesign stage included the following: choosing meaningful therapy targets, integrating impairment and psychological therapy, managing endings, involving family, supporting home practice, dosage and delivery, and achieving real-life change. Participants in the proof-of-concept study made significant gains on the CPIB ( p = .006, Cohen's d = 1.37). All participants highly valued the therapeutic relationship and were positive about combining psychological and language components within the same intervention. Conclusions: ELLA has been designed as a holistic, humanistic language therapy. This study suggests that ELLA may be a promising way to enable SLPs to address both emotional and language recovery.

American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology
University of Nottingham (GB), St George's, University of London (GB)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 42%
Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.