Refractive Risk Factors for Amblyopia in Turkish Preschoolers: A School-Based Vision Screening Study of 1126 Children

Numan Küçük, Sılay Canturk Uğurbaş, Atilla Alpay, Suat Hayri Uğurba&#x015FDepartment of Ophthalmology, Zonguldak Bülent Ecevit University, Zonguldak, TurkiyeCorrespondence: Numan Küçük, Zonguldak Bulent Ecevit University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Ophthalmology, Zonguldak, Turkiye, Tel +90 (536) 323 80 08, Email [email protected]: To evaluate refractive risk factors for unilateral and bilateral amblyopia.Methods: In October 2019, 1126 preschool and primary school 1st grade students in Kozlu district of Zonguldak province underwent eye screening with a pediatric autorefractometer in a school environment. 125 children who were above the threshold values determined for refractive errors or for whom measurements could not be taken due to patient compliance were referred to us for eye examination. The referred children underwent a comprehensive eye examination. Amblyopia risk factors were analyzed with a logistic regression model.Results: Of the 125 referred children 106 were examined comprehensively. Of those 99 were analyzed. A total of 30 amblyopic children were identified (Unilateral amblyopia n=20, bilateral amblyopia n=10). The prevalence of amblyopia was found to be 2.6%. In regression analysis, presence of < 2 D and 2– 4 D hyperopia were found to be isolated risk factors for amblyopia (p< 0.05). Astigmatism was a risk factor unilateral and bilateral amblyopia in univariate analysis (p=0.001, p=0.001 respectively). Incrementing values of anisometropia did not influence the development of amblyopia. However, the incidence rate of amblyopia increased in the incrementing diopters of anisometropia (11.4% at 0.5 D and below, 25.9% at 0.5– 1 D range, 54.5% at 1– 2 D range, 100% for 2 D and above). Myopia association with amblyopia was not statistically significant.Conclusion: We found lower than the generally accepted threshold values of hypermetropia, astigmatism and anisometropia to be risk factors for amblyopia. Our data can help shape threshold values and screening policies for refractive errors. More population-based studies are needed in different regions of our country in order to make guidelines consisting of optimal threshold values that can be used in amblyopia screening programs.Keywords: amblyopia, strabismus, plusoptix, photoscreening

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Dove Medical Press (Taylor and Francis Group)
Published
2026-05-22
Primary Topic
Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Refractive Risk Factors for Amblyopia in Turkish Preschoolers: A School-Based Vision Screening Study of 1126 Children

Atilla Alpay, Suat Uğurbaş, Numan Küçük, Sılay Canturk Uğurbaş
Dove Medical Press (Taylor and Francis Group)
Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
article

Refractive Risk Factors for Amblyopia in Turkish Preschoolers: A School-Based Vision Screening Study of 1126 Children

Atilla Alpay, Suat Uğurbaş, Numan Küçük, Sılay Canturk Uğurbaş
article en

Abstract

Numan Küçük, Sılay Canturk Uğurbaş, Atilla Alpay, Suat Hayri Uğurba&#x015FDepartment of Ophthalmology, Zonguldak Bülent Ecevit University, Zonguldak, TurkiyeCorrespondence: Numan Küçük, Zonguldak Bulent Ecevit University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Ophthalmology, Zonguldak, Turkiye, Tel +90 (536) 323 80 08, Email [email protected]: To evaluate refractive risk factors for unilateral and bilateral amblyopia.Methods: In October 2019, 1126 preschool and primary school 1st grade students in Kozlu district of Zonguldak province underwent eye screening with a pediatric autorefractometer in a school environment. 125 children who were above the threshold values determined for refractive errors or for whom measurements could not be taken due to patient compliance were referred to us for eye examination. The referred children underwent a comprehensive eye examination. Amblyopia risk factors were analyzed with a logistic regression model.Results: Of the 125 referred children 106 were examined comprehensively. Of those 99 were analyzed. A total of 30 amblyopic children were identified (Unilateral amblyopia n=20, bilateral amblyopia n=10). The prevalence of amblyopia was found to be 2.6%. In regression analysis, presence of < 2 D and 2– 4 D hyperopia were found to be isolated risk factors for amblyopia (p< 0.05). Astigmatism was a risk factor unilateral and bilateral amblyopia in univariate analysis (p=0.001, p=0.001 respectively). Incrementing values of anisometropia did not influence the development of amblyopia. However, the incidence rate of amblyopia increased in the incrementing diopters of anisometropia (11.4% at 0.5 D and below, 25.9% at 0.5– 1 D range, 54.5% at 1– 2 D range, 100% for 2 D and above). Myopia association with amblyopia was not statistically significant.Conclusion: We found lower than the generally accepted threshold values of hypermetropia, astigmatism and anisometropia to be risk factors for amblyopia. Our data can help shape threshold values and screening policies for refractive errors. More population-based studies are needed in different regions of our country in order to make guidelines consisting of optimal threshold values that can be used in amblyopia screening programs.Keywords: amblyopia, strabismus, plusoptix, photoscreening

Dove Medical Press (Taylor and Francis Group)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.