Future Pharmacists in the Age of Artificial Intelligence: A Mixed-Methods Study of First-Year Students in Vietnam

OBJECTIVES: To assess AI readiness, perceptions, and usage patterns among first-year pharmacy students, and to identify factors associated with AI engagement. METHODS: A mixed-methods study was conducted among 220 first-year pharmacy students. Quantitative data were collected using a structured questionnaire assessing AI readiness (cognition, ability, vision, ethics), perceptions, and usage, followed by multivariable regression analyses. Qualitative insights were obtained through semi-structured interviews with a purposive subsample and analyzed thematically. RESULTS: Students showed moderate overall AI readiness, with higher cognition and ability than vision and ethics. AI use was common, primarily for academic tasks, with ChatGPT as the most frequently used tool. Positive perceptions of AI in education predominated, alongside concerns about academic integrity and over-reliance. Higher digital literacy and urban residence were associated with greater AI readiness and more favorable perceptions. Qualitative findings revealed strong interest in structured, pharmacy-specific AI education emphasizing practical application and ethical guidance. CONCLUSIONS: First-year pharmacy students demonstrate positive attitudes but uneven preparedness for AI. Early, structured integration of AI training that combines technical foundations with ethical and future-oriented perspectives is needed to support responsible AI adoption in pharmacy education.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Medical Education
Published
2026-05-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-026-09368-4
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Future Pharmacists in the Age of Artificial Intelligence: A Mixed-Methods Study of First-Year Students in Vietnam

Duc Hoang Minh, Giang Ha Hai, Tam Ngo Thi, Long Nguyen Hoang
BMC Medical Education
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
article

Future Pharmacists in the Age of Artificial Intelligence: A Mixed-Methods Study of First-Year Students in Vietnam

Duc Hoang Minh, Giang Ha Hai, Tam Ngo Thi, Long Nguyen Hoang
article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To assess AI readiness, perceptions, and usage patterns among first-year pharmacy students, and to identify factors associated with AI engagement. METHODS: A mixed-methods study was conducted among 220 first-year pharmacy students. Quantitative data were collected using a structured questionnaire assessing AI readiness (cognition, ability, vision, ethics), perceptions, and usage, followed by multivariable regression analyses. Qualitative insights were obtained through semi-structured interviews with a purposive subsample and analyzed thematically. RESULTS: Students showed moderate overall AI readiness, with higher cognition and ability than vision and ethics. AI use was common, primarily for academic tasks, with ChatGPT as the most frequently used tool. Positive perceptions of AI in education predominated, alongside concerns about academic integrity and over-reliance. Higher digital literacy and urban residence were associated with greater AI readiness and more favorable perceptions. Qualitative findings revealed strong interest in structured, pharmacy-specific AI education emphasizing practical application and ethical guidance. CONCLUSIONS: First-year pharmacy students demonstrate positive attitudes but uneven preparedness for AI. Early, structured integration of AI training that combines technical foundations with ethical and future-oriented perspectives is needed to support responsible AI adoption in pharmacy education.

BMC Medical Education
Ton Duc Thang University (VN), Duy Tan University (VN), Hội Gastroenterology Việt Nam (VN)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.