The structured light scanner is a reliable, valid, and clinically feasible 3D laser scanner to assess leg volume in patients with leg lymphedema

PURPOSE: To investigate the reliability, concurrent validity, and clinical feasibility of a structured light scanner (SLS) for measuring leg volume in patients with lymphedema. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Leg volume was measured using the SLS, circumference measurements, and optoelectronic volumetry. Intra-and inter-rater reliability were assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs), standard error of measurement (SEM), and smallest real difference (SRD). Concurrent validity was determined by calculating correlation coefficients. Clinical feasibility was evaluated through timing of procedures and a purpose-designed questionnaire. RESULTS: This cross-sectional study was conducted at the Center for Lymphedema, University Hospital Leuven, involving 33 patients (66 legs) with predominantly secondary (70%) and stage 2a (73%) lymphedema (NCT07017166). All three methods showed excellent reliability. Circumference measurements had the highest intra-rater (ICC: 0.999) and inter-rater (ICC: 0.999) reliability, followed by optoelectronic volumetry (intra-rater ICC: 0.988; inter-rater ICC: 0.994) and the SLS (intra-rater ICC: 0.986; inter-rater ICC: 0.982). SLS showed a strong correlation with circumference measurements and with optoelectronic volumetry. The SLS was the most clinically feasible. CONCLUSION: The SLS demonstrates good reliability and concurrent validity for assessing leg volume and appears to have fewer practical limitations than conventional methods, although further research is needed to reduce measurement error and confirm clinical implementation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Disability and Rehabilitation
Published
2026-05-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2026.2663759
Primary Topic
Lymphatic System and Diseases
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The structured light scanner is a reliable, valid, and clinically feasible 3D laser scanner to assess leg volume in patients with leg lymphedema

Wouter Everaerts, Inge Geraerts, Nele Devoogdt, Charlotte Van Calster et al.
Disability and Rehabilitation
Lymphatic System and Diseases
article

The structured light scanner is a reliable, valid, and clinically feasible 3D laser scanner to assess leg volume in patients with leg lymphedema

Wouter Everaerts, Inge Geraerts, Nele Devoogdt, Charlotte Van Calster, An‐Kathleen Heroes, Luc Labey, Juliette Weerts, An De Groef, Ann-Sofie Vergauwe
article en

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate the reliability, concurrent validity, and clinical feasibility of a structured light scanner (SLS) for measuring leg volume in patients with lymphedema. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Leg volume was measured using the SLS, circumference measurements, and optoelectronic volumetry. Intra-and inter-rater reliability were assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs), standard error of measurement (SEM), and smallest real difference (SRD). Concurrent validity was determined by calculating correlation coefficients. Clinical feasibility was evaluated through timing of procedures and a purpose-designed questionnaire. RESULTS: This cross-sectional study was conducted at the Center for Lymphedema, University Hospital Leuven, involving 33 patients (66 legs) with predominantly secondary (70%) and stage 2a (73%) lymphedema (NCT07017166). All three methods showed excellent reliability. Circumference measurements had the highest intra-rater (ICC: 0.999) and inter-rater (ICC: 0.999) reliability, followed by optoelectronic volumetry (intra-rater ICC: 0.988; inter-rater ICC: 0.994) and the SLS (intra-rater ICC: 0.986; inter-rater ICC: 0.982). SLS showed a strong correlation with circumference measurements and with optoelectronic volumetry. The SLS was the most clinically feasible. CONCLUSION: The SLS demonstrates good reliability and concurrent validity for assessing leg volume and appears to have fewer practical limitations than conventional methods, although further research is needed to reduce measurement error and confirm clinical implementation.

Disability and Rehabilitation
University of Antwerp (BE), Lymphedema Therapy (United States) (US), KU Leuven (BE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Lymphatic System and Diseases
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.