Peak Expiratory Flow Variability after Abdominal Surgery: A Prospective Observational Study in Peru

Introduction Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) is a practical marker of airway patency and cough effectiveness, yet perioperative evidence from Latin American surgical populations is limited. This study aimed to quantify postoperative PEF variability after abdominal surgery and identify associated factors. Methods We conducted a prospective observational study at a Peruvian hospital in 2024. Adults undergoing elective abdominal surgery performed PEF testing with a Mini-Wright meter preoperatively and on postoperative day 7 using a standard three-maneuver protocol. The highest valid value was retained. The primary outcome was PEF variability, defined as the difference between preoperative and postoperative PEF (L/min). Group comparisons used non-parametric tests, and multivariable linear regression identified independent predictors. Results Eighty-two patients were included; 58.5% were women, and the median age was 48 years. Mean preoperative and postoperative PEF values were 367.9 ± 71.9 and 346.0 ± 74.8 L/min, respectively. Median PEF variability was 20 L/min (IQR 10–30). Variability did not differ by sex or BMI. Age was the only independent predictor of greater decline. Discussion Abdominal surgery was associated with an early postoperative reduction in expiratory flow, particularly in older adults. Conclusion Routine perioperative PEF assessment may help identify patients who require closer respiratory monitoring and early supportive therapy in resource-constrained surgical settings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Open Respiratory Medicine Journal
Published
2026-05-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2174/0118743064442343260505045704
Primary Topic
Respiratory Support and Mechanisms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Peak Expiratory Flow Variability after Abdominal Surgery: A Prospective Observational Study in Peru

Miguel A. Arce-Huamani, Milagros N. Rosas-Sudario, Diana P. Reyes-Alata
The Open Respiratory Medicine Journal
Respiratory Support and Mechanisms
article

Peak Expiratory Flow Variability after Abdominal Surgery: A Prospective Observational Study in Peru

Miguel A. Arce-Huamani, Milagros N. Rosas-Sudario, Diana P. Reyes-Alata
article en

Abstract

Introduction Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) is a practical marker of airway patency and cough effectiveness, yet perioperative evidence from Latin American surgical populations is limited. This study aimed to quantify postoperative PEF variability after abdominal surgery and identify associated factors. Methods We conducted a prospective observational study at a Peruvian hospital in 2024. Adults undergoing elective abdominal surgery performed PEF testing with a Mini-Wright meter preoperatively and on postoperative day 7 using a standard three-maneuver protocol. The highest valid value was retained. The primary outcome was PEF variability, defined as the difference between preoperative and postoperative PEF (L/min). Group comparisons used non-parametric tests, and multivariable linear regression identified independent predictors. Results Eighty-two patients were included; 58.5% were women, and the median age was 48 years. Mean preoperative and postoperative PEF values were 367.9 ± 71.9 and 346.0 ± 74.8 L/min, respectively. Median PEF variability was 20 L/min (IQR 10–30). Variability did not differ by sex or BMI. Age was the only independent predictor of greater decline. Discussion Abdominal surgery was associated with an early postoperative reduction in expiratory flow, particularly in older adults. Conclusion Routine perioperative PEF assessment may help identify patients who require closer respiratory monitoring and early supportive therapy in resource-constrained surgical settings.

The Open Respiratory Medicine JournalVol. 20(1)
Universidad Norbert Wiener (PE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Respiratory Support and Mechanisms
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.