Maximising the impact of remittances on development outcomes: the case of SADC

This paper investigates how remittances from South Africa to 10 countries in the Southern African Development Cooperation (SADC) region could be directed through formal channels to impact on development outcomes. Using annual data from 1994 to 2008, two-step system GMM by Arellano and Bover (1995) and seemingly unrelated regressions by Zellner (1962), we find that when spatial and individual effects are controlled for, different factors drive remittances to the SADC countries in the panel. Whiles altruism prevails in some, self interest prevails in others. This implies that the optimal policy pathway aimed at mitigating the use of informal channels or maximising the impact of remittances on development outcomes would differ between countries. Overall, the level of financial deepening in the home country is also crucial to the use of formal channels and the ability of countries to harness remittances for development purposes.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Human Science Research Council SA
Published
2026-05-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14749/32383674
Primary Topic
Migration and Labor Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Maximising the impact of remittances on development outcomes: the case of SADC

Human Sciences Research Council
Human Science Research Council SA
Migration and Labor Dynamics
article

Maximising the impact of remittances on development outcomes: the case of SADC

Human Sciences Research Council
article en

Abstract

This paper investigates how remittances from South Africa to 10 countries in the Southern African Development Cooperation (SADC) region could be directed through formal channels to impact on development outcomes. Using annual data from 1994 to 2008, two-step system GMM by Arellano and Bover (1995) and seemingly unrelated regressions by Zellner (1962), we find that when spatial and individual effects are controlled for, different factors drive remittances to the SADC countries in the panel. Whiles altruism prevails in some, self interest prevails in others. This implies that the optimal policy pathway aimed at mitigating the use of informal channels or maximising the impact of remittances on development outcomes would differ between countries. Overall, the level of financial deepening in the home country is also crucial to the use of formal channels and the ability of countries to harness remittances for development purposes.

Human Science Research Council SA
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Migration and Labor Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.