Digital civics in action: the promise and emerging practices of generative AI in grassroots community advocacy

Abstract In an era marked by intensifying civic challenges and rapid digital transformation, grassroots advocacy groups face increasing pressure to adapt and innovate. Digital civics, a field exploring how digital tools can support civic participation, offers one pathway forward. This study investigates how generative AI (GenAI) tools, such as large language models and image generators, can support grassroots community groups in advancing three key goals: (i) improving scrutiny; (ii) boosting outreach, and; (iii) enhancing advocacy. While GenAI presents new opportunities for fostering digital civics, it also raises critical questions about risks, ethics, confidentiality, and trust in technology-enabled civic processes. This study employs a qualitative, participatory, design-led methodology, involving semi-structured interviews and a co-design workshop. The study was conducted in collaboration with Brisbane Residents United, the representative peak body for community and local citizen action groups in Brisbane, Australia, at a time when civic and urban planning issues are gaining renewed urgency ahead of the 2032 Olympic Games. Our findings reveal emerging GenAI use cases for grassroots advocacy, such as simplifying complex planning documents, creating persuasive campaign materials, and streamlining the drafting of petitions and submissions. At the same time, the study identifies key concerns, including misinformation, privacy, and intellectual property, which must be addressed to ensure ethical and strategic deployment of AI tools in grassroots contexts. This paper contributes timely and practical insights into how digital civics in action—when co-designed with communities—can help bridge the gap between emerging technologies and grassroots democratic innovation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
AI & Society
Published
2026-05-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-026-03108-4
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Digital civics in action: the promise and emerging practices of generative AI in grassroots community advocacy

Marcus Foth, Büşra Üstündağ, Jen Seevinck
AI & Society
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

Digital civics in action: the promise and emerging practices of generative AI in grassroots community advocacy

Marcus Foth, Büşra Üstündağ, Jen Seevinck
article en

Abstract

Abstract In an era marked by intensifying civic challenges and rapid digital transformation, grassroots advocacy groups face increasing pressure to adapt and innovate. Digital civics, a field exploring how digital tools can support civic participation, offers one pathway forward. This study investigates how generative AI (GenAI) tools, such as large language models and image generators, can support grassroots community groups in advancing three key goals: (i) improving scrutiny; (ii) boosting outreach, and; (iii) enhancing advocacy. While GenAI presents new opportunities for fostering digital civics, it also raises critical questions about risks, ethics, confidentiality, and trust in technology-enabled civic processes. This study employs a qualitative, participatory, design-led methodology, involving semi-structured interviews and a co-design workshop. The study was conducted in collaboration with Brisbane Residents United, the representative peak body for community and local citizen action groups in Brisbane, Australia, at a time when civic and urban planning issues are gaining renewed urgency ahead of the 2032 Olympic Games. Our findings reveal emerging GenAI use cases for grassroots advocacy, such as simplifying complex planning documents, creating persuasive campaign materials, and streamlining the drafting of petitions and submissions. At the same time, the study identifies key concerns, including misinformation, privacy, and intellectual property, which must be addressed to ensure ethical and strategic deployment of AI tools in grassroots contexts. This paper contributes timely and practical insights into how digital civics in action—when co-designed with communities—can help bridge the gap between emerging technologies and grassroots democratic innovation.

AI & Society
Queensland University of Technology (AU)
Queensland University of Technology
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Digital civics in action: the promise and emerging practices of generative AI in grassroots community advocacy — Marcus Foth, Büşra Üstündağ, et al. · AI & Society (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS