Honor Endorsement Strengthens Military Personnel's Help‐Seeking Stigma Toward Mental Health

INTRODUCTION: Suicide among US military personnel (active-duty and veterans) is a public health crisis, with rates among personnel far exceeding that of the general population. However, military-related suicide rates are not evenly distributed across the United States, with research indicating that they are higher in more honor-oriented states. In addition to firearm accessibility being a significant suicide risk factor for both military personnel and individuals in honor cultures, both groups also stigmatize help-seeking for mental healthcare. We examined whether honor endorsement differentially affected military personnel and civilians help-seeking stigma, hypothesizing that self-stigma and perceived social stigma would be strongest among honor-oriented military personnel. METHOD: Participants were 236 civilians and 475 military personnel. We examined associations between their endorsement of honor norms and three forms of help-seeking stigma while controlling for relevant factors (e.g., gender, income, health insurance). RESULTS: Both military personnel (v. civilians) and honor endorsement were associated with greater self-stigma and perceived social stigma, but not barriers to care. Most importantly, honor endorsement strengthened military personnel's self-stigma and perceived social stigma toward help-seeking. CONCLUSIONS: Findings add to literature on the honor-military association and suggest that the cultural ideology of honor might serve as a barrier to help-seeking for military personnel.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior
Published
2026-05-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/sltb.70113
Primary Topic
Cultural Differences and Values
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Honor Endorsement Strengthens Military Personnel's Help‐Seeking Stigma Toward Mental Health

Jacques de Villiers, Jarrod E. Bock, Katy Jones, Stephen Foster
Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior
Cultural Differences and Values
article

Honor Endorsement Strengthens Military Personnel's Help‐Seeking Stigma Toward Mental Health

Jacques de Villiers, Jarrod E. Bock, Katy Jones, Stephen Foster
article en

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Suicide among US military personnel (active-duty and veterans) is a public health crisis, with rates among personnel far exceeding that of the general population. However, military-related suicide rates are not evenly distributed across the United States, with research indicating that they are higher in more honor-oriented states. In addition to firearm accessibility being a significant suicide risk factor for both military personnel and individuals in honor cultures, both groups also stigmatize help-seeking for mental healthcare. We examined whether honor endorsement differentially affected military personnel and civilians help-seeking stigma, hypothesizing that self-stigma and perceived social stigma would be strongest among honor-oriented military personnel. METHOD: Participants were 236 civilians and 475 military personnel. We examined associations between their endorsement of honor norms and three forms of help-seeking stigma while controlling for relevant factors (e.g., gender, income, health insurance). RESULTS: Both military personnel (v. civilians) and honor endorsement were associated with greater self-stigma and perceived social stigma, but not barriers to care. Most importantly, honor endorsement strengthened military personnel's self-stigma and perceived social stigma toward help-seeking. CONCLUSIONS: Findings add to literature on the honor-military association and suggest that the cultural ideology of honor might serve as a barrier to help-seeking for military personnel.

Suicide and Life-Threatening BehaviorVol. 56(3)
University of Wyoming (US), Pennsylvania State University (US)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Cultural Differences and Values
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.