Nurse leaders’ perspectives on a feasibility randomized controlled trial evaluating an online training program to improve evidence-based leadership: a qualitative descriptive study

BACKGROUND: Qualitative evaluation is crucial for leadership feasibility RCTs, as it deepens the interpretation of findings and informs definitive trial design. Yet, such evaluations are lacking. This study describes nurse leaders' perspectives on a feasibility RCT evaluating an online training program to improve evidence-based leadership. METHODS: This qualitative descriptive study followed a feasibility RCT. Using purposive sampling, we recruited nurse leaders from the intervention group. From August 15 to August 24, 2023, we conducted five focus group interviews with 25 participants. Data were analyzed using content analysis, focusing on four feasibility categories: (1) intervention content and delivery, (2) trial design, conduct, and processes, (3) outcomes, and (4) measures. The reporting of the study was guided by the Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research (COREQ) checklist. RESULTS: Participants valued the training but found its complex content challenging to understand and apply in daily practice; this led to specific suggestions for refinement (Category 1). They emphasized the need for leadership training to be accessible to all nurses, recommending either entry requirements or multi-level training tailored to different competency levels (Category 2). For outcome evaluation, they proposed replacing "self-efficacy" with "evidence-based leadership efficacy" (Category 3), developing targeted assessment tools for evidence-based leadership, and incorporating qualitative methods to assess the intention to leave their professional role or workplace (Category 4). CONCLUSION: This study pioneers the qualitative evaluation of a feasibility RCT focused on leadership training, providing participant-informed insights across key feasibility domains. The findings yield valuable insights for enhancing the feasibility and effectiveness of future evidence-based leadership training programs utilizing RCT designs. Furthermore, they offer practical guidance for developing leadership interventions in comparable contexts. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This trial was prospectively registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05244499) on February 7, 2022. The protocol and feasibility RCT are published in peerreviewed journals.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Nursing
Published
2026-05-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-026-04779-6
Primary Topic
Nursing education and management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Nurse leaders’ perspectives on a feasibility randomized controlled trial evaluating an online training program to improve evidence-based leadership: a qualitative descriptive study

Huiping Hu, Siying Liu, Gaoming Liu, Qizhi Yang et al.
BMC Nursing
Nursing education and management
article

Nurse leaders’ perspectives on a feasibility randomized controlled trial evaluating an online training program to improve evidence-based leadership: a qualitative descriptive study

Huiping Hu, Siying Liu, Gaoming Liu, Qizhi Yang, Hu S, Maritta Välimäki, Jiale Hu, Batool Shumaila, Xianhong Li, Wenjun Chen
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Qualitative evaluation is crucial for leadership feasibility RCTs, as it deepens the interpretation of findings and informs definitive trial design. Yet, such evaluations are lacking. This study describes nurse leaders' perspectives on a feasibility RCT evaluating an online training program to improve evidence-based leadership. METHODS: This qualitative descriptive study followed a feasibility RCT. Using purposive sampling, we recruited nurse leaders from the intervention group. From August 15 to August 24, 2023, we conducted five focus group interviews with 25 participants. Data were analyzed using content analysis, focusing on four feasibility categories: (1) intervention content and delivery, (2) trial design, conduct, and processes, (3) outcomes, and (4) measures. The reporting of the study was guided by the Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research (COREQ) checklist. RESULTS: Participants valued the training but found its complex content challenging to understand and apply in daily practice; this led to specific suggestions for refinement (Category 1). They emphasized the need for leadership training to be accessible to all nurses, recommending either entry requirements or multi-level training tailored to different competency levels (Category 2). For outcome evaluation, they proposed replacing "self-efficacy" with "evidence-based leadership efficacy" (Category 3), developing targeted assessment tools for evidence-based leadership, and incorporating qualitative methods to assess the intention to leave their professional role or workplace (Category 4). CONCLUSION: This study pioneers the qualitative evaluation of a feasibility RCT focused on leadership training, providing participant-informed insights across key feasibility domains. The findings yield valuable insights for enhancing the feasibility and effectiveness of future evidence-based leadership training programs utilizing RCT designs. Furthermore, they offer practical guidance for developing leadership interventions in comparable contexts. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This trial was prospectively registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05244499) on February 7, 2022. The protocol and feasibility RCT are published in peerreviewed journals.

BMC Nursing
Central South University (CN), Hong Kong Baptist University (HK), Hunan University of Traditional Chinese Medicine (CN), University of Turku (FI), Virginia Commonwealth University (US), Hunan Cancer Hospital (CN), Northern Jiangsu People's Hospital (CN), Hunan Provincial Maternal and Child Health Hospital (CN)
Hunan Provincial Science and Technology Department, China Scholarship Council, Turun Yliopisto
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Nursing education and management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.