Breast Conserving Therapy versus Mastectomy in Young Women: Oncologic and Quality of Life Outcomes

Abstract Purpose of Review This review is intended to explore unique considerations for breast conservation versus mastectomy for management of unilateral breast cancer in young patients. Recent Findings There is limited recent work directly comparing mastectomy and breast conserving therapy for young women. Historical work establishes oncologic equivalence of the two surgical approaches, and work within the last 10 years suggests minimal overall difference in quality of life. Summary There are multiple patient specific factors, including patient preference and candidacy for adjuvant therapies, that can inform the best surgical management for those young patients diagnosed with unilateral breast cancer. Additionally, while the literature does not support one approach being definitively superior either in terms of oncologic benefit or quality of life, there are multiple patient-level factors that should be incorporated into an informed discussion with a young person diagnosed with breast cancer to help guide surgical treatment approach.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Current Breast Cancer Reports
Published
2026-05-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12609-026-00656-y
Primary Topic
Breast Implant and Reconstruction
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Breast Conserving Therapy versus Mastectomy in Young Women: Oncologic and Quality of Life Outcomes

Ava Ferguson Bryan, Sarah P. Shubeck
Current Breast Cancer Reports
Breast Implant and Reconstruction
article

Breast Conserving Therapy versus Mastectomy in Young Women: Oncologic and Quality of Life Outcomes

Ava Ferguson Bryan, Sarah P. Shubeck
article en

Abstract

Abstract Purpose of Review This review is intended to explore unique considerations for breast conservation versus mastectomy for management of unilateral breast cancer in young patients. Recent Findings There is limited recent work directly comparing mastectomy and breast conserving therapy for young women. Historical work establishes oncologic equivalence of the two surgical approaches, and work within the last 10 years suggests minimal overall difference in quality of life. Summary There are multiple patient specific factors, including patient preference and candidacy for adjuvant therapies, that can inform the best surgical management for those young patients diagnosed with unilateral breast cancer. Additionally, while the literature does not support one approach being definitively superior either in terms of oncologic benefit or quality of life, there are multiple patient-level factors that should be incorporated into an informed discussion with a young person diagnosed with breast cancer to help guide surgical treatment approach.

Current Breast Cancer ReportsVol. 18(1)
University of Chicago (US)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Breast Implant and Reconstruction
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.