Implementation evaluation of the Integrated Justice System: evaluation framework

The evaluation framework sets out the guide for conducting the Implementation Evaluation of IJS covering the period 2010/11 to 2015/16. Ideally the framework for evaluations for such programmes should be developed at the outset of the programme and allow for the fine-tuning of objectives, the inclusion of indicators for success and guidance on what data to collect (Quainoo, 2010). This implementation evaluation framework is informed by: ��� Local and international best practice in the evaluation of such programmes; ��� International benchmarks as drawn from an extensive literature review undertaken as the first component of this study; ��� The review of available documented information on the establishment and functioning of the IJS; ��� Alignment of the design to the specific objectives as outlined in the IJS Study Terms of Reference; ��� Pragmatic considerations of availability of data, the costs associated with use of different techniques and the time frames for implementing the study.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Human Science Research Council SA
Published
2026-05-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14749/32383953
Primary Topic
Evaluation and Performance Assessment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Implementation evaluation of the Integrated Justice System: evaluation framework

Human Sciences Research Council
Human Science Research Council SA
Evaluation and Performance Assessment
article

Implementation evaluation of the Integrated Justice System: evaluation framework

Human Sciences Research Council
article en

Abstract

The evaluation framework sets out the guide for conducting the Implementation Evaluation of IJS covering the period 2010/11 to 2015/16. Ideally the framework for evaluations for such programmes should be developed at the outset of the programme and allow for the fine-tuning of objectives, the inclusion of indicators for success and guidance on what data to collect (Quainoo, 2010). This implementation evaluation framework is informed by: ��� Local and international best practice in the evaluation of such programmes; ��� International benchmarks as drawn from an extensive literature review undertaken as the first component of this study; ��� The review of available documented information on the establishment and functioning of the IJS; ��� Alignment of the design to the specific objectives as outlined in the IJS Study Terms of Reference; ��� Pragmatic considerations of availability of data, the costs associated with use of different techniques and the time frames for implementing the study.

Human Science Research Council SA
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Evaluation and Performance Assessment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.