Identity as Accountability Chain: A Post-Quantum Architecture for Persistent Identity Across Human, Machine, and AI Agent Substrates

We propose a formal model in which identity is not a primitive but a layered accountability chain that accretes from a founding individuation event and persists as long as cryptographic, relational, and civic verification can be reconstructed. The model unifies biological, machine, agent, AI, and physical-goods cases under a single schema with six accretion layers and a four-tier permanence hierarchy for substrate-level identifiers. We state and prove seven results that bear directly on engineering: (i) Founding uniqueness, every identity locus has exactly one origin event; (ii) Tier monotonicity, the permanence of an identity claim is non-increasing in the tier of its substrate identifier; (iii) Stratum well-foundedness, every scoped or agent identity traces in finite steps to a person- or organization-rooted identity; (iv) LLM instance non-identity, two LLM instances with identical weights but disjoint deployment IDs are distinct identity loci; (v) Cryptographic survival, only post-quantum-signed identities remain verifiable past a cryptographically relevant quantum computer (CRQC) event; (vi) Crypto-shredding completeness, master-key deletion renders all envelope-encrypted credentials computationally inaccessible without recourse to unpinning; and (vii) Verification-time accountability, the reference verify_chain procedure terminates correctly in a finite number of steps. The seven theorems are formalized in Lean 4 (Mathlib v4.27.0) and build with zero sorries at github.com/Paraxiom/identity-architecture-lean, commit e3806ac: four are kernel-checked deductively from the model primitives, three at the chain-reduction layer relative to four named cryptographic and probabilistic axioms. The treatise names four sources from which identity content arises (externally witnessed, self-asserted, cumulatively earned, algorithmically derived), formalizes self-assertion as a first-class entry in the accountability chain, scopes non-consensual third-party identity out of the primitive and points to the regulatory layer that addresses it, and generalizes the relational graph to a hypergraph with an identity-state hash addressing identity by current state. Version 1.1 adds nested hypergraph identity for composite agents. Additional results on governance-level participation and privacy-preserving disclosure (selective disclosure soundness, unlinkability under pairwise pseudonyms) ground a five-tier privacy model; these additional results are stated as theorems in the text and are not among the seven machine-checked ones. Version 1.1 (24 September 2026) corrects v1.0 on implementation status against the QuantumHarmony runtime (specification 45): the identity-registry, onboarding-commit, credential-vault, axiom-attestation, substrate-attestation and reputation-tokens pallets are in the runtime; pallet-governance-bodies is specified but not yet in the runtime; the substrate attestation pallet is described as implemented (three extrinsics, claims recorded without verification of training); the role field of the identity registry is set by the registrant and not attested. The priority footnote on the term "augmented democracy" is corrected to the public record: the author's text is dated August 2017, its first repository commit is 15 April 2018, and Hidalgo's TED talk was recorded in April 2018 and released online on 5 March 2019. No deployment of this architecture is in production; the network is a three-validator test network. We survey the state of digital identity as of May 2026, noting that no major civic identity system runs post-quantum signatures in production despite regulatory deadlines of 2030 to 2035, and that AI agent identity is a standards vacuum. A positioning subsection tabulates the model-layer primitives this treatise contributes over the W3C VC 2.0 and DIDs v1.1 stack. We present the Paraxiom architecture as a three-tier system combining on-chain post-quantum primitives (QuantumHarmony, with SPHINCS+ and Falcon-512), IPFS for bulk encrypted payloads, and Postgres+Redis mirrors for query-layer access, grounded in five identity strata (S1 to S5). The treatise concludes that identity is engineering, not philosophy: the accountability chain does not extend itself; the post-quantum signatures do not sign themselves. What we build now determines whether identity remains a coherent concept past 2040.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-09-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20328037
Primary Topic
Bioethics and Human Rights Issues
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Identity as Accountability Chain: A Post-Quantum Architecture for Persistent Identity Across Human, Machine, and AI Agent Substrates

Sylvain Cormier
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Bioethics and Human Rights Issues
article

Identity as Accountability Chain: A Post-Quantum Architecture for Persistent Identity Across Human, Machine, and AI Agent Substrates

Sylvain Cormier
article en

Abstract

We propose a formal model in which identity is not a primitive but a layered accountability chain that accretes from a founding individuation event and persists as long as cryptographic, relational, and civic verification can be reconstructed. The model unifies biological, machine, agent, AI, and physical-goods cases under a single schema with six accretion layers and a four-tier permanence hierarchy for substrate-level identifiers. We state and prove seven results that bear directly on engineering: (i) Founding uniqueness, every identity locus has exactly one origin event; (ii) Tier monotonicity, the permanence of an identity claim is non-increasing in the tier of its substrate identifier; (iii) Stratum well-foundedness, every scoped or agent identity traces in finite steps to a person- or organization-rooted identity; (iv) LLM instance non-identity, two LLM instances with identical weights but disjoint deployment IDs are distinct identity loci; (v) Cryptographic survival, only post-quantum-signed identities remain verifiable past a cryptographically relevant quantum computer (CRQC) event; (vi) Crypto-shredding completeness, master-key deletion renders all envelope-encrypted credentials computationally inaccessible without recourse to unpinning; and (vii) Verification-time accountability, the reference verify_chain procedure terminates correctly in a finite number of steps. The seven theorems are formalized in Lean 4 (Mathlib v4.27.0) and build with zero sorries at github.com/Paraxiom/identity-architecture-lean, commit e3806ac: four are kernel-checked deductively from the model primitives, three at the chain-reduction layer relative to four named cryptographic and probabilistic axioms. The treatise names four sources from which identity content arises (externally witnessed, self-asserted, cumulatively earned, algorithmically derived), formalizes self-assertion as a first-class entry in the accountability chain, scopes non-consensual third-party identity out of the primitive and points to the regulatory layer that addresses it, and generalizes the relational graph to a hypergraph with an identity-state hash addressing identity by current state. Version 1.1 adds nested hypergraph identity for composite agents. Additional results on governance-level participation and privacy-preserving disclosure (selective disclosure soundness, unlinkability under pairwise pseudonyms) ground a five-tier privacy model; these additional results are stated as theorems in the text and are not among the seven machine-checked ones. Version 1.1 (24 September 2026) corrects v1.0 on implementation status against the QuantumHarmony runtime (specification 45): the identity-registry, onboarding-commit, credential-vault, axiom-attestation, substrate-attestation and reputation-tokens pallets are in the runtime; pallet-governance-bodies is specified but not yet in the runtime; the substrate attestation pallet is described as implemented (three extrinsics, claims recorded without verification of training); the role field of the identity registry is set by the registrant and not attested. The priority footnote on the term "augmented democracy" is corrected to the public record: the author's text is dated August 2017, its first repository commit is 15 April 2018, and Hidalgo's TED talk was recorded in April 2018 and released online on 5 March 2019. No deployment of this architecture is in production; the network is a three-validator test network. We survey the state of digital identity as of May 2026, noting that no major civic identity system runs post-quantum signatures in production despite regulatory deadlines of 2030 to 2035, and that AI agent identity is a standards vacuum. A positioning subsection tabulates the model-layer primitives this treatise contributes over the W3C VC 2.0 and DIDs v1.1 stack. We present the Paraxiom architecture as a three-tier system combining on-chain post-quantum primitives (QuantumHarmony, with SPHINCS+ and Falcon-512), IPFS for bulk encrypted payloads, and Postgres+Redis mirrors for query-layer access, grounded in five identity strata (S1 to S5). The treatise concludes that identity is engineering, not philosophy: the accountability chain does not extend itself; the post-quantum signatures do not sign themselves. What we build now determines whether identity remains a coherent concept past 2040.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 51%
Bioethics and Human Rights Issues
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.