Construal and Contact in Person–Situation Relations: Evidence from Controlled and Naturalistic Designs

Personality is increasingly viewed as a dynamic system arising from the interaction between individuals and their situations. Yet, in naturalistic data, within-person links between personality states and situation perceptions often conflate two distinct mechanisms: situation contact—what people objectively encounter—and situation construal—how they interpret these encounters. To disentangle these components, we combined two longitudinal approaches: a standardized laboratory study (N = 189) in which situation contact was held largely constant, and a naturalistic experience-sampling study (N = 1,596) capturing the diversity of everyday contexts. Multilevel models revealed meaningful within-person covariation between Big Five states and situation perceptions in both designs, with effect sizes that were small to medium in magnitude and theoretically coherent across both settings. However, in the naturalistic study, person–situation associations varied systematically across situation cues—social partner, location, and activity—with some associations shifting in magnitude or reversing direction depending on the context. Together, these findings suggest that construal is a primary driver of person–situation associations, but that situation contact shapes which associations emerge, to what degree, and across which situation perception dimensions. Accounting for situation contact may therefore help to more accurately capture personality as a context-sensitive, dynamic system.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Personality
Published
2026-05-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/08902070261449352
Primary Topic
Personality Traits and Psychology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Construal and Contact in Person–Situation Relations: Evidence from Controlled and Naturalistic Designs

Fabian Gander, Maximiliane Uhlich, Alexander Grob, Alex Traut et al.
European Journal of Personality
Personality Traits and Psychology
article

Construal and Contact in Person–Situation Relations: Evidence from Controlled and Naturalistic Designs

Fabian Gander, Maximiliane Uhlich, Alexander Grob, Alex Traut, Ursula Hess, Matthias Ziegler, Sophie C. Bauditz
article en

Abstract

Personality is increasingly viewed as a dynamic system arising from the interaction between individuals and their situations. Yet, in naturalistic data, within-person links between personality states and situation perceptions often conflate two distinct mechanisms: situation contact—what people objectively encounter—and situation construal—how they interpret these encounters. To disentangle these components, we combined two longitudinal approaches: a standardized laboratory study (N = 189) in which situation contact was held largely constant, and a naturalistic experience-sampling study (N = 1,596) capturing the diversity of everyday contexts. Multilevel models revealed meaningful within-person covariation between Big Five states and situation perceptions in both designs, with effect sizes that were small to medium in magnitude and theoretically coherent across both settings. However, in the naturalistic study, person–situation associations varied systematically across situation cues—social partner, location, and activity—with some associations shifting in magnitude or reversing direction depending on the context. Together, these findings suggest that construal is a primary driver of person–situation associations, but that situation contact shapes which associations emerge, to what degree, and across which situation perception dimensions. Accounting for situation contact may therefore help to more accurately capture personality as a context-sensitive, dynamic system.

European Journal of Personality
University of Basel (CH), Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin (DE)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Personality Traits and Psychology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.