Test-retest reliability of self-reported adolescent addictive and other risk behaviours in Tanzania, South Africa and Zimbabwe

The aim was to ascertain the test-retest reliability of a wide range of addictive and other adolescent risk behaviours using questionnaires in Swahili in Dar es Salaam, Xhosa in Cape Town, and Shona in Harare. The sample consisted of 119, 104 and 112 in the three sites respectively. Of the 43 variables for which Cohen's kappa was the appropriate measure, the reliability was poor for 0 (0.0%), fair for 5 (11.6%), moderate for 16 (37.2%), substantial for 20 (46.58%) and almost perfect for 2 (4.7%). Of the 27 variables for which the observed agreement was the most appropriate measure, it was above 90% for 22 (81.5%) variables. All three versions of our questionnaire provide data that is of acceptable reliability.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Human Science Research Council SA
Published
2026-05-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14749/32383452
Primary Topic
Reliability and Agreement in Measurement
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Test-retest reliability of self-reported adolescent addictive and other risk behaviours in Tanzania, South Africa and Zimbabwe

Human Sciences Research Council
Human Science Research Council SA
Reliability and Agreement in Measurement
article

Test-retest reliability of self-reported adolescent addictive and other risk behaviours in Tanzania, South Africa and Zimbabwe

Human Sciences Research Council
article en

Abstract

The aim was to ascertain the test-retest reliability of a wide range of addictive and other adolescent risk behaviours using questionnaires in Swahili in Dar es Salaam, Xhosa in Cape Town, and Shona in Harare. The sample consisted of 119, 104 and 112 in the three sites respectively. Of the 43 variables for which Cohen's kappa was the appropriate measure, the reliability was poor for 0 (0.0%), fair for 5 (11.6%), moderate for 16 (37.2%), substantial for 20 (46.58%) and almost perfect for 2 (4.7%). Of the 27 variables for which the observed agreement was the most appropriate measure, it was above 90% for 22 (81.5%) variables. All three versions of our questionnaire provide data that is of acceptable reliability.

Human Science Research Council SA
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Reliability and Agreement in Measurement
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.