Comparing Solar Structure Detection Methods in SDO/AIA Observations and the Application to Raw Uncalibrated Data

Abstract Recent advances in solar physics increasingly rely on automated identification of coronal structures using machine learning. Yet most studies emphasize scientific performance without evaluating feasibility for onboard deployment to prioritize downlink observations. This work investigates the automated identification of active regions and coronal holes by applying segmentation and detection techniques to Solar Dynamics Observatory (SDO) data. We compare three approaches: SCSS‐Net, a deep learning model for semantic segmentation; YOLOv8n, a lightweight object detector; and a traditional pipeline based on basic computer vision operations (BCVO). Each method is assessed for its scientific accuracy and its suitability for deployment in future resource‐limited missions. While no direct hardware benchmarking is performed in this study, we assess the feasibility of onboard implementation based on the associated number of trainable parameters, architecture and hardware requirements. Training and evaluation are first conducted on well‐calibrated SDO images. We then extend the evaluation to raw and uncalibrated SDO images affected by instrumental artifacts. Performance is measured using the Intersection over Union (IoU) and Dice score. Results show that while SCSS‐Net achieves the highest segmentation quality, YOLOv8n offers a strong balance between accuracy and efficiency. The BCVO pipeline remains viable under strict hardware limitations. Interestingly, our models retain compatibility on Level‐0 observations. This is the first study comparing these widely used methods from the perspective of onboard deployment. Our findings provide a foundation for designing frameworks tailored to onboard hardware configurations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Geophysical Research Machine Learning and Computation
Published
2026-05-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1029/2025jh001023
Primary Topic
Solar and Space Plasma Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparing Solar Structure Detection Methods in SDO/AIA Observations and the Application to Raw Uncalibrated Data

P. Gonidakis, E. Dineva, P. Antunes, F. Carella et al.
Journal of Geophysical Research Machine Learning and Computation
Solar and Space Plasma Dynamics
article

Comparing Solar Structure Detection Methods in SDO/AIA Observations and the Application to Raw Uncalibrated Data

P. Gonidakis, E. Dineva, P. Antunes, F. Carella, S. Raptis, G. Miloshevich, H-J. Jeong, A. Podobas, V. Toy-Edens, S. Poedts, M. Jin, J. Magdalenic
article en

Abstract

Abstract Recent advances in solar physics increasingly rely on automated identification of coronal structures using machine learning. Yet most studies emphasize scientific performance without evaluating feasibility for onboard deployment to prioritize downlink observations. This work investigates the automated identification of active regions and coronal holes by applying segmentation and detection techniques to Solar Dynamics Observatory (SDO) data. We compare three approaches: SCSS‐Net, a deep learning model for semantic segmentation; YOLOv8n, a lightweight object detector; and a traditional pipeline based on basic computer vision operations (BCVO). Each method is assessed for its scientific accuracy and its suitability for deployment in future resource‐limited missions. While no direct hardware benchmarking is performed in this study, we assess the feasibility of onboard implementation based on the associated number of trainable parameters, architecture and hardware requirements. Training and evaluation are first conducted on well‐calibrated SDO images. We then extend the evaluation to raw and uncalibrated SDO images affected by instrumental artifacts. Performance is measured using the Intersection over Union (IoU) and Dice score. Results show that while SCSS‐Net achieves the highest segmentation quality, YOLOv8n offers a strong balance between accuracy and efficiency. The BCVO pipeline remains viable under strict hardware limitations. Interestingly, our models retain compatibility on Level‐0 observations. This is the first study comparing these widely used methods from the perspective of onboard deployment. Our findings provide a foundation for designing frameworks tailored to onboard hardware configurations.

Journal of Geophysical Research Machine Learning and ComputationVol. 3(3)
Maria Curie-Skłodowska University (PL), Royal Observatory of Belgium (BE), Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory (US), Kyung Hee University (KR), VIB-KU Leuven Center for Microbiology (BE), Lockheed Martin (United Kingdom) (GB), KTH Royal Institute of Technology (SE)
Kyung Hee University, Belgian Federal Science Policy Office, Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek, KU Leuven, Horizon 2020 Framework Programme, HORIZON EUROPE Marie Sklodowska-Curie Actions, HORIZON EUROPE European Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Solar and Space Plasma Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.