Pharyngeal Dysphagia in Cancer: Characterizing Functional and Physiological Swallow Targets Across 12 Cancer Types

Dysphagia is common across cancer populations, yet it remains poorly characterized outside of head and neck (HN) cancer. Defining swallowing profiles in diverse cancer groups is essential to guide targeted supportive care and rehabilitation. We analyzed 10,677 MBSs from 6,423 adult cancer patients referred for dysphagia assessment (2016-2021) across 12 cancer diagnoses, at a designated comprehensive cancer center. Swallowing safety and efficiency were graded using the DIGEST scale. Multivariable mixed-effects ordinal logistic regression assessed differences in DIGEST impairment (≥ 1) across diagnoses. In a subset of 704 studies, physiologic impairments were examined with the MBSImP and correlated with DIGEST outcomes. Dysphagia frequency varied significantly across cancer types for overall, safety, and efficiency domains (all p < 0.05). Overall dysphagia (DIGEST ≥ 1) was most frequent in patients with multiple cancers including HN (71%) and gastrointestinal (64%) and lowest in breast and endocrine/thyroid cancers. Safety impairments were highest in patients with multiple cancers including HN (59%), gastrointestinal (52%), and CNS (51%), while efficiency deficits predominated in patients with multiple cancers including HN (54%), HN alone (46%), CNS and multiple non-HN cancers (both 44%). Pharyngeal swallow initiation, anterior hyoid excursion, and laryngeal vestibular closure were the most frequently impaired physiologic components. Correlations between MBSImP and DIGEST varied across cancer types. Swallowing impairment profiles differ substantially by cancer type, and link to distinct physiologic targets. These findings support developing cancer-specific dysphagia pathways and integrating physiologic and functional metrics to optimize rehabilitation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Dysphagia
Published
2026-05-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-026-10965-0
Primary Topic
Dysphagia Assessment and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Pharyngeal Dysphagia in Cancer: Characterizing Functional and Physiological Swallow Targets Across 12 Cancer Types

Ariana J Sahli, Beatrice Manduchi, Carla L. Warneke, Xiaohui Tang et al.
Dysphagia
Dysphagia Assessment and Management
article

Pharyngeal Dysphagia in Cancer: Characterizing Functional and Physiological Swallow Targets Across 12 Cancer Types

Ariana J Sahli, Beatrice Manduchi, Carla L. Warneke, Xiaohui Tang, Sheila N. Buoy, Katherine A. Hutcheson, Carly E. A. Barbon
article en

Abstract

Dysphagia is common across cancer populations, yet it remains poorly characterized outside of head and neck (HN) cancer. Defining swallowing profiles in diverse cancer groups is essential to guide targeted supportive care and rehabilitation. We analyzed 10,677 MBSs from 6,423 adult cancer patients referred for dysphagia assessment (2016-2021) across 12 cancer diagnoses, at a designated comprehensive cancer center. Swallowing safety and efficiency were graded using the DIGEST scale. Multivariable mixed-effects ordinal logistic regression assessed differences in DIGEST impairment (≥ 1) across diagnoses. In a subset of 704 studies, physiologic impairments were examined with the MBSImP and correlated with DIGEST outcomes. Dysphagia frequency varied significantly across cancer types for overall, safety, and efficiency domains (all p < 0.05). Overall dysphagia (DIGEST ≥ 1) was most frequent in patients with multiple cancers including HN (71%) and gastrointestinal (64%) and lowest in breast and endocrine/thyroid cancers. Safety impairments were highest in patients with multiple cancers including HN (59%), gastrointestinal (52%), and CNS (51%), while efficiency deficits predominated in patients with multiple cancers including HN (54%), HN alone (46%), CNS and multiple non-HN cancers (both 44%). Pharyngeal swallow initiation, anterior hyoid excursion, and laryngeal vestibular closure were the most frequently impaired physiologic components. Correlations between MBSImP and DIGEST varied across cancer types. Swallowing impairment profiles differ substantially by cancer type, and link to distinct physiologic targets. These findings support developing cancer-specific dysphagia pathways and integrating physiologic and functional metrics to optimize rehabilitation.

Dysphagia
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (US), The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (US)
Cancer Prevention and Research Institute of Texas, National Cancer Institute
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Dysphagia Assessment and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.