Personalization of Neoadjuvant Immunotherapy in High-Risk Resectable Melanoma and Utility of ctDNA as a Biomarker of Immunotherapy Response

BACKGROUND: Randomized trials demonstrated superior outcomes with neoadjuvant immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) compared with adjuvant ICI alone for patients with resectable macroscopic melanoma. However, the optimal perioperative strategy remains undetermined, and biomarkers are lacking. Real-world data reporting the feasibility of limited resection and the utility of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) in predicting melanoma recurrence could help inform optimal practice. METHODS: Retrospective data regarding treatment, outcomes, and safety were collected for 76 patients who had melanoma treated with neoadjuvant ICI from 2020 to 2024. Signatera ctDNA results were available for 22 patients. RESULTS: Of the 76 patients, 42 (55%) received ipilimumab plus nivolumab (Ipi/Nivo), 31 (41%) received anti-PD1 monotherapy, and 3 (4%) received nivolumab plus relatlimab. The patients included 64 (84%) who underwent planned surgical excision, 25 who underwent upfront total lymph node dissection (TLND), and 32 who underwent index node excision (INE), with reflex TLND performed for 7 patients. The overall major pathologic response (MPR) rate was 55% (49% with Ipi/Nivo and 65% with monotherapy). Six (21%) of 28 non-MPR patients did not receive adjuvant therapy. After a median follow-up period of 15.8 months, recurrence rates were comparable between the INE (9%) and TLND (12%) cohorts. At the time of surgery, ctDNA was undetectable in the majority of the MPR patients (9/11) and the minority of the non-MPR patients (4/11). Postoperatively, ctDNA was detectable in 1 of 20 patients. CONCLUSIONS: A personalized surgical approach to neoadjuvant ICI was feasible, with comparable recurrence rates between the patients who underwent INE and those who underwent TLND. For the patients without MPR, subsequent adjuvant therapy improved recurrence-free survival (p = 0.046). The ctDNA results correlated with the clinical outcomes, suggesting that ctDNA may complement pathologic response in guiding management.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Annals of Surgical Oncology
Published
2026-05-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-026-19814-8
Primary Topic
Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Personalization of Neoadjuvant Immunotherapy in High-Risk Resectable Melanoma and Utility of ctDNA as a Biomarker of Immunotherapy Response

Tarini Shankar, Thomas J. Otten, Sonia Cohen, Tanya Sharova et al.
Annals of Surgical Oncology
Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management
article

Personalization of Neoadjuvant Immunotherapy in High-Risk Resectable Melanoma and Utility of ctDNA as a Biomarker of Immunotherapy Response

Tarini Shankar, Thomas J. Otten, Sonia Cohen, Tanya Sharova, Maria Christina Crespo, Madak Basnet, Alma Burbano, Derek N. Effiom, Genevieve M. Boland, Ryan J. Sullivan, Meghan J. Mooradian, Kevin Emerick, Emily Spurr, Gina Bangrazi, Aleigha Lawless, Julianne Andrade Czapla
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Randomized trials demonstrated superior outcomes with neoadjuvant immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) compared with adjuvant ICI alone for patients with resectable macroscopic melanoma. However, the optimal perioperative strategy remains undetermined, and biomarkers are lacking. Real-world data reporting the feasibility of limited resection and the utility of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) in predicting melanoma recurrence could help inform optimal practice. METHODS: Retrospective data regarding treatment, outcomes, and safety were collected for 76 patients who had melanoma treated with neoadjuvant ICI from 2020 to 2024. Signatera ctDNA results were available for 22 patients. RESULTS: Of the 76 patients, 42 (55%) received ipilimumab plus nivolumab (Ipi/Nivo), 31 (41%) received anti-PD1 monotherapy, and 3 (4%) received nivolumab plus relatlimab. The patients included 64 (84%) who underwent planned surgical excision, 25 who underwent upfront total lymph node dissection (TLND), and 32 who underwent index node excision (INE), with reflex TLND performed for 7 patients. The overall major pathologic response (MPR) rate was 55% (49% with Ipi/Nivo and 65% with monotherapy). Six (21%) of 28 non-MPR patients did not receive adjuvant therapy. After a median follow-up period of 15.8 months, recurrence rates were comparable between the INE (9%) and TLND (12%) cohorts. At the time of surgery, ctDNA was undetectable in the majority of the MPR patients (9/11) and the minority of the non-MPR patients (4/11). Postoperatively, ctDNA was detectable in 1 of 20 patients. CONCLUSIONS: A personalized surgical approach to neoadjuvant ICI was feasible, with comparable recurrence rates between the patients who underwent INE and those who underwent TLND. For the patients without MPR, subsequent adjuvant therapy improved recurrence-free survival (p = 0.046). The ctDNA results correlated with the clinical outcomes, suggesting that ctDNA may complement pathologic response in guiding management.

Annals of Surgical Oncology
Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary (US), Harvard University (US), Massachusetts General Hospital (US), Global Cancer Institute (US), Mass General Brigham (US)
Dr. Miriam and Sheldon G. Adelson Medical Research Foundation
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.