A scoping review of COVID-19 modelling studies in Belgium 2020-2024: incorporation of behaviour and lessons learned

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic underscored the importance of integrating human behaviour in infectious disease modelling approaches, yet an in-depth assessment of how behavioural components are incorporated remains limited. We conducted a scoping review of COVID-19 models applied to Belgian data to examine how behavioural dynamics, both voluntary and policy-driven, were represented within model structures. Our aim was to identify current practices, highlight methodological gaps, and provide recommendations for the development of behaviourally integrated epidemiological models. METHODS: Using Scopus and PubMed, we identified 98 studies published between March 2020 and October 2024, describing 105 models in total. Models were classified by model class (mathematical, statistical, or ensemble), objectives, approaches used to incorporate behavioural factors, and types of behaviour data employed. RESULTS: Behavioural integration was confined to specific modelling contexts, with only half of the 105 models incorporating behavioural components. Mechanistic models, particularly compartmental models, were the most likely to include behavioural features, especially in studies assessing non-pharmaceutical interventions or conducting long-term forecasts and scenario analyses. Behavioural change was most commonly represented through modifications to transmission parameters or contact matrices. These adjustments were frequently informed by social contact surveys or mobility data derived from various sources. CONCLUSIONS: In contrast to previous reviews that focused exclusively on behavioural models, this study evaluates the full landscape of Belgian COVID-19 models, offering a comprehensive perspective on how behavioural representation varies across modelling approaches. Our findings recommend that effective behavioural integration relies on timely, routine, and disaggregated surveillance and behaviour data, alongside the use of flexible mechanistic models.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Archives of Public Health
Published
2026-05-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13690-026-01959-3
Primary Topic
COVID-19 epidemiological studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A scoping review of COVID-19 modelling studies in Belgium 2020-2024: incorporation of behaviour and lessons learned

Simon Dellicour, Steven Abrams, Marie-Cécile Dupas, Niel Hens et al.
Archives of Public Health
COVID-19 epidemiological studies
article

A scoping review of COVID-19 modelling studies in Belgium 2020-2024: incorporation of behaviour and lessons learned

Simon Dellicour, Steven Abrams, Marie-Cécile Dupas, Niel Hens, Roel Jude Bagaforo
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic underscored the importance of integrating human behaviour in infectious disease modelling approaches, yet an in-depth assessment of how behavioural components are incorporated remains limited. We conducted a scoping review of COVID-19 models applied to Belgian data to examine how behavioural dynamics, both voluntary and policy-driven, were represented within model structures. Our aim was to identify current practices, highlight methodological gaps, and provide recommendations for the development of behaviourally integrated epidemiological models. METHODS: Using Scopus and PubMed, we identified 98 studies published between March 2020 and October 2024, describing 105 models in total. Models were classified by model class (mathematical, statistical, or ensemble), objectives, approaches used to incorporate behavioural factors, and types of behaviour data employed. RESULTS: Behavioural integration was confined to specific modelling contexts, with only half of the 105 models incorporating behavioural components. Mechanistic models, particularly compartmental models, were the most likely to include behavioural features, especially in studies assessing non-pharmaceutical interventions or conducting long-term forecasts and scenario analyses. Behavioural change was most commonly represented through modifications to transmission parameters or contact matrices. These adjustments were frequently informed by social contact surveys or mobility data derived from various sources. CONCLUSIONS: In contrast to previous reviews that focused exclusively on behavioural models, this study evaluates the full landscape of Belgian COVID-19 models, offering a comprehensive perspective on how behavioural representation varies across modelling approaches. Our findings recommend that effective behavioural integration relies on timely, routine, and disaggregated surveillance and behaviour data, alongside the use of flexible mechanistic models.

Archives of Public Health
Université Libre de Bruxelles (BE), Vrije Universiteit Brussel (BE), University of Antwerp (BE), Rega Institute for Medical Research (BE), Hasselt University (BE)
Belgian Federal Science Policy Office, Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
COVID-19 epidemiological studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.