Crisis of planetary health: Epistemological holism and the production of environmental risk

The concept of ‘planetary health’ is a novel transdisciplinary research and policy framework introduced in a 2015 report by the Rockefeller Foundation–Lancet Commission on Planetary Health. This paper offers a reading and philosophical critique of that report by interrogating the more fundamental theoretical assumptions underlying the planetary health framework. This involves, firstly, understanding the dominant conception of environmental crisis as a physical threat to a planetary system and ‘planetary health’ as a solution to this threat. After that, this paper examines the distinctive holistic methodology of the ‘planetary health’ framework before arguing that the initial report overlooks the fundamentally qualitative nature of holistic definitions of ‘health’. The paper concludes by recommending a more qualitative, value-driven assessment of planetary health that is attentive to global inequality and conflict over land use. This article was published open access under a CC BY 4.0 licence: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ .

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Global Environment
Published
2026-05-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3828/whpge.63881453971819
Primary Topic
Climate Change and Health Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Crisis of planetary health: Epistemological holism and the production of environmental risk

Finian Worrall
Global Environment
Climate Change and Health Impacts
article

Crisis of planetary health: Epistemological holism and the production of environmental risk

Finian Worrall
article en

Abstract

The concept of ‘planetary health’ is a novel transdisciplinary research and policy framework introduced in a 2015 report by the Rockefeller Foundation–Lancet Commission on Planetary Health. This paper offers a reading and philosophical critique of that report by interrogating the more fundamental theoretical assumptions underlying the planetary health framework. This involves, firstly, understanding the dominant conception of environmental crisis as a physical threat to a planetary system and ‘planetary health’ as a solution to this threat. After that, this paper examines the distinctive holistic methodology of the ‘planetary health’ framework before arguing that the initial report overlooks the fundamentally qualitative nature of holistic definitions of ‘health’. The paper concludes by recommending a more qualitative, value-driven assessment of planetary health that is attentive to global inequality and conflict over land use. This article was published open access under a CC BY 4.0 licence: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ .

Global EnvironmentVol. 19(2)
The Centre for Health (New Zealand) (NZ)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Climate Change and Health Impacts
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.