The Oneiric Leaper: Repetition, Distortion, and the Subject in Narrative

This article argues that narrative knowledge is transmitted through repetition rather than decipherment — and that there is no hidden story behind the story. From this premise, it proposes a topological account of narrative subjectivity, locating the subject not in images or characters, but in the interval that separates them — in the leap. To clarify this claim, the essay distinguishes three articulated but non-equivalent levels: repetition as structural principle, distortion as its mode of appearance in the unconscious, and profound similarity, in Walter Benjamin's sense, as its aesthetic form. Taking Bruno Schulz's Cinnamon Shops and Sanatorium Under the Sign of the Hourglass as its primary corpus, the article develops a methodological criterion for identifying narratives that operate topologically: works that leap rather than explain their leaps. In Schulz, spatio-temporal displacements leave visible traces — witnesses to the leap — in which distortion becomes legible as an index of the subject. The comparison between the two collections demonstrates how excessive rationalization interrupts the leap and weakens narrative force.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Knowledge Commons (Lakehead University)
Published
2026-05-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17613/2gnhe-jc229
Primary Topic
Walter Benjamin Studies Compilation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Oneiric Leaper: Repetition, Distortion, and the Subject in Narrative

Julia T. S. Martins
Knowledge Commons (Lakehead University)
Walter Benjamin Studies Compilation
article

The Oneiric Leaper: Repetition, Distortion, and the Subject in Narrative

Julia T. S. Martins
article en

Abstract

This article argues that narrative knowledge is transmitted through repetition rather than decipherment — and that there is no hidden story behind the story. From this premise, it proposes a topological account of narrative subjectivity, locating the subject not in images or characters, but in the interval that separates them — in the leap. To clarify this claim, the essay distinguishes three articulated but non-equivalent levels: repetition as structural principle, distortion as its mode of appearance in the unconscious, and profound similarity, in Walter Benjamin's sense, as its aesthetic form. Taking Bruno Schulz's Cinnamon Shops and Sanatorium Under the Sign of the Hourglass as its primary corpus, the article develops a methodological criterion for identifying narratives that operate topologically: works that leap rather than explain their leaps. In Schulz, spatio-temporal displacements leave visible traces — witnesses to the leap — in which distortion becomes legible as an index of the subject. The comparison between the two collections demonstrates how excessive rationalization interrupts the leap and weakens narrative force.

Knowledge Commons (Lakehead University)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Walter Benjamin Studies Compilation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Oneiric Leaper: Repetition, Distortion, and the Subject in Narrative — Julia T. S. Martins · Knowledge Commons (Lakehead University) (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS