Development and validation of an effectiveness evaluation scale for low-carbon construction technologies in building engineering based on multi-stage empirical evidence

To address the lack of systematic evaluation instruments for assessing the "practical effectiveness" of low-carbon construction technologies (LCCTs) in the construction engineering sector, this study aims to develop a comprehensive evaluation scale. Based on the anomaly-seeking approach, a theoretical framework encompassing four dimensions-technology, organization, environment, and society-was developed through the extensive observation of research phenomena, the examination of underlying patterns within these phenomena, and their reinterpretation through alternative theoretical lenses. Subsequently, the scale was subjected to multi-stage empirical testing using content validity assessment, exploratory factor analysis, and confirmatory factor analysis. The results demonstrate that the proposed scale exhibits strong reliability, validity, and structural stability, and is capable of effectively characterizing the effectiveness of LCCTs in construction engineering. By approaching low-carbon construction from an "effectiveness" perspective, this study expands the scope of low-carbon construction research and provides quantitative tool support for project-level low-carbon performance diagnosis, optimization of management decision-making, and policy formulation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2026-05-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-53661-7
Primary Topic
Environmental Impact and Sustainability
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Development and validation of an effectiveness evaluation scale for low-carbon construction technologies in building engineering based on multi-stage empirical evidence

Yikun Su, Junhao Liu, Zhizhe Zheng, Zhongjie Sun
Scientific Reports
Environmental Impact and Sustainability
article

Development and validation of an effectiveness evaluation scale for low-carbon construction technologies in building engineering based on multi-stage empirical evidence

Yikun Su, Junhao Liu, Zhizhe Zheng, Zhongjie Sun
article en

Abstract

To address the lack of systematic evaluation instruments for assessing the "practical effectiveness" of low-carbon construction technologies (LCCTs) in the construction engineering sector, this study aims to develop a comprehensive evaluation scale. Based on the anomaly-seeking approach, a theoretical framework encompassing four dimensions-technology, organization, environment, and society-was developed through the extensive observation of research phenomena, the examination of underlying patterns within these phenomena, and their reinterpretation through alternative theoretical lenses. Subsequently, the scale was subjected to multi-stage empirical testing using content validity assessment, exploratory factor analysis, and confirmatory factor analysis. The results demonstrate that the proposed scale exhibits strong reliability, validity, and structural stability, and is capable of effectively characterizing the effectiveness of LCCTs in construction engineering. By approaching low-carbon construction from an "effectiveness" perspective, this study expands the scope of low-carbon construction research and provides quantitative tool support for project-level low-carbon performance diagnosis, optimization of management decision-making, and policy formulation.

Scientific Reports
Harbin University of Commerce (CN), Northeast Forestry University (CN)
National Key Research and Development Program of China
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Environmental Impact and Sustainability
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.