Prognosis of patients with hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative, 1–3 node-positive breast cancer meeting the high-risk criteria of the monarchE trial: a comparison between macrometastasis and micrometastasis

BACKGROUND: The monarchE trial enrolled patients with hormone receptor (HR)-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative, node-positive, high-risk early breast cancer (EBC). Although both macrometastasis and micrometastasis were eligible, the number of patients with only micrometastasis was not reported, leaving their prognosis uncertain. This study compared outcomes of patients with 1-3 positive axillary lymph nodes (pALNs), including those with only micrometastases and those with macrometastases, according to monarchE high-risk criteria. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 844 patients with HR-positive/HER2-negative/node-positive EBC from a prospectively maintained institutional database and classified them into four groups: Group 1, 1-3 pALNs (including macrometastasis) with grade 3 tumors or tumors ≥ 5 cm; Group 2, 1-3 pALNs (only micrometastasis) with grade 3 tumors or tumors ≥ 5 cm; Group 3, 1-3 pALNs (including macrometastasis) with grade < 3 tumors and tumors < 5 cm; and Group 4, 1-3 pALNs (only micrometastasis) with grade < 3 tumors and tumors < 5 cm. Invasive disease-free survival (IDFS) and distant relapse-free survival (DRFS) were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test. Univariable Cox models assessed associations between clinical factors and outcomes. RESULTS: Group 2 showed outcomes comparable to Group 1 (5-year IDFS: 80.7% vs. 83.7%; DRFS: 89.5% vs. 87.9%). In univariate analysis, only tumor size-rather than Group 2 or histological grade-was prognostic for IDFS and DRFS. Sensitivity analyses restricted to patients undergoing axillary lymph node dissection yielded consistent results. CONCLUSIONS: Among HR-positive/HER2-negative EBC, high-risk patients with only micrometastasis demonstrated prognoses similar to those with macrometastasis.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Breast Cancer
Published
2026-05-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12282-026-01871-2
Primary Topic
Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Prognosis of patients with hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative, 1–3 node-positive breast cancer meeting the high-risk criteria of the monarchE trial: a comparison between macrometastasis and micrometastasis

Eriko Iwamoto, Chikashi Watase, Ayako Nakashoji, Hinako Maeda et al.
Breast Cancer
Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
article

Prognosis of patients with hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative, 1–3 node-positive breast cancer meeting the high-risk criteria of the monarchE trial: a comparison between macrometastasis and micrometastasis

Eriko Iwamoto, Chikashi Watase, Ayako Nakashoji, Hinako Maeda, Mengge Chen, Ayumi Ogawa, Sayako Tsubota, Takeshi Murata, Shin Takayama, Masayuki Yoshida, Natsuko Ohgi, Akiko Maeshima
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The monarchE trial enrolled patients with hormone receptor (HR)-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative, node-positive, high-risk early breast cancer (EBC). Although both macrometastasis and micrometastasis were eligible, the number of patients with only micrometastasis was not reported, leaving their prognosis uncertain. This study compared outcomes of patients with 1-3 positive axillary lymph nodes (pALNs), including those with only micrometastases and those with macrometastases, according to monarchE high-risk criteria. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 844 patients with HR-positive/HER2-negative/node-positive EBC from a prospectively maintained institutional database and classified them into four groups: Group 1, 1-3 pALNs (including macrometastasis) with grade 3 tumors or tumors ≥ 5 cm; Group 2, 1-3 pALNs (only micrometastasis) with grade 3 tumors or tumors ≥ 5 cm; Group 3, 1-3 pALNs (including macrometastasis) with grade < 3 tumors and tumors < 5 cm; and Group 4, 1-3 pALNs (only micrometastasis) with grade < 3 tumors and tumors < 5 cm. Invasive disease-free survival (IDFS) and distant relapse-free survival (DRFS) were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test. Univariable Cox models assessed associations between clinical factors and outcomes. RESULTS: Group 2 showed outcomes comparable to Group 1 (5-year IDFS: 80.7% vs. 83.7%; DRFS: 89.5% vs. 87.9%). In univariate analysis, only tumor size-rather than Group 2 or histological grade-was prognostic for IDFS and DRFS. Sensitivity analyses restricted to patients undergoing axillary lymph node dissection yielded consistent results. CONCLUSIONS: Among HR-positive/HER2-negative EBC, high-risk patients with only micrometastasis demonstrated prognoses similar to those with macrometastasis.

Breast Cancer
National Cancer Centre Japan (JP), National Cancer Center (US), National Cancer Research Institute (GB)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.