Proceedings of the first international NMIBC consensus classification meeting

Non–muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) is a biologically and clinically heterogeneous disease, accounting for approximately 75% of bladder cancer cases. Over the past decade, multiple RNA-based molecular classification systems for NMIBC have been proposed, demonstrating associations with tumor stage, grade, prognosis, and treatment response. However, unlike muscle-invasive bladder cancer, a unified consensus classification for NMIBC is lacking, limiting clinical translation and cross-study comparability. To address this gap, the first NMIBC Consensus Classification Meeting was convened in November 2024 at Erasmus University Medical Center, bringing together 13 international experts from seven countries representing major NMIBC molecular classification efforts. This report summarizes the discussions, comparative evaluation of existing classification systems, and the agreed strategy towards developing a consensus molecular model. The meeting focused on harmonizing heterogeneous transcriptomic datasets, integrating RNA sequencing and microarray platforms, and assessing the applicability of classification models across tumor stages (Ta/T1) and grades. Key features, strengths, and limitations of the Lund Taxonomy, Leeds, Birmingham, UROMOL, and Rotterdam (BCG response) subtypes were critically examined. Building on prior experience from the muscle-invasive bladder cancer consensus, participants agreed on a centroid-based clustering framework using rigorously defined core samples to derive stable consensus subtypes and a single-sample classifier with associated probability scores. A large, curated dataset encompassing approximately 2500 NMIBC samples from published cohorts will facilitate model development and validation. The resulting consensus classification aims to improve biological understanding, facilitate reproducibility across studies, and enable future evaluation of prognostic and therapeutic relevance, including response to intravesical BCG therapy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Bladder Cancer
Published
2026-05-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/23523735261417949
Primary Topic
Bladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Proceedings of the first international NMIBC consensus classification meeting

Florus C. de Jong, L. Baekelandt, Richard T. Bryan, Tahlita C.M. Zuiverloon et al.
Bladder Cancer
Bladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments
article

Proceedings of the first international NMIBC consensus classification meeting

Florus C. de Jong, L. Baekelandt, Richard T. Bryan, Tahlita C.M. Zuiverloon, J. Alberto Nakauma-González, Gottfrid Sjödahl, Mitchell Olislagers, Anshita Goel, Ane Moreno-Oya, Roland Arnold, Murat Akand, Pontus Eriksson, Sia V. Lindskrog, Joep J. de Jong, Sebastien Rinaldetti
article en

Abstract

Non–muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) is a biologically and clinically heterogeneous disease, accounting for approximately 75% of bladder cancer cases. Over the past decade, multiple RNA-based molecular classification systems for NMIBC have been proposed, demonstrating associations with tumor stage, grade, prognosis, and treatment response. However, unlike muscle-invasive bladder cancer, a unified consensus classification for NMIBC is lacking, limiting clinical translation and cross-study comparability. To address this gap, the first NMIBC Consensus Classification Meeting was convened in November 2024 at Erasmus University Medical Center, bringing together 13 international experts from seven countries representing major NMIBC molecular classification efforts. This report summarizes the discussions, comparative evaluation of existing classification systems, and the agreed strategy towards developing a consensus molecular model. The meeting focused on harmonizing heterogeneous transcriptomic datasets, integrating RNA sequencing and microarray platforms, and assessing the applicability of classification models across tumor stages (Ta/T1) and grades. Key features, strengths, and limitations of the Lund Taxonomy, Leeds, Birmingham, UROMOL, and Rotterdam (BCG response) subtypes were critically examined. Building on prior experience from the muscle-invasive bladder cancer consensus, participants agreed on a centroid-based clustering framework using rigorously defined core samples to derive stable consensus subtypes and a single-sample classifier with associated probability scores. A large, curated dataset encompassing approximately 2500 NMIBC samples from published cohorts will facilitate model development and validation. The resulting consensus classification aims to improve biological understanding, facilitate reproducibility across studies, and enable future evaluation of prognostic and therapeutic relevance, including response to intravesical BCG therapy.

Bladder CancerVol. 12(2)
Centre Hospitalier de Luxembourg (LU), Lund University (SE), Aarhus University (DK), Erasmus MC (NL), Aarhus University Hospital (DK), Spanish National Cancer Research Centre (ES), Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Cáncer (ES), University of Birmingham (GB), KU Leuven (BE)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Bladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.