Smart Pens: Expectations Regarding Use and Functionality From Health Care Providers

OBJECTIVE: As part of the 2025 diabetes and technology (dt)-report, this study explored indications for use, barriers to adoption, and perceived functionality of smart pens. METHODS: An online survey conducted between November and December 2024 gathered responses from diabetes specialists and diabetes educators (health care professionals [HCPs]) in Germany (DE), Austria (AT), Switzerland (CH), and Spain (ES). Participants estimated the proportion of individuals with diabetes who would benefit from smart pens, rated the significance of specific functions, and evaluated barriers on 5-point scales. RESULTS: The survey included 1294 HCPs (69.2% DE, 9.7% AT, 7.0% CH; 14.1% ES). Current usage of smart pens is estimated at 4% to 15% for people with type 1 diabetes and 3% to 6% for those with type 2 diabetes. However, the indication rate is markedly higher, ranging from 51% to 73% for people with type 1 and up to 69% for those with type 2 with intensive insulin therapy. Most valued features included reminders for missed insulin doses (4.4 ± 0.7), bolus dose suggestions (4.1 ± 0.8), integration with continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) apps (4.1 ± 0.8), and temperature alerts (3.7 ± 1.0). Basal insulin suggestions were considered less important (3.3 ± 1.1). No significant differences were found between physicians and diabetes educators. Major barriers included preference for disposable pens (57%), limited device options (54%), and high cost (53%). Among DE respondents, concerns over cost reimbursement rose compared to the 2024 dt-report. CONCLUSION: Smart pens are underutilized compared to expectations. Cost and reimbursement remain the predominant barriers, while reminder functionality stands out as the most valued feature.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology
Published
2026-05-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/19322968261448215
Primary Topic
Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Smart Pens: Expectations Regarding Use and Functionality From Health Care Providers

Peter Diem, Dominic Ehrmann, Derek Brandt, Michael Resl et al.
Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology
Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
article

Smart Pens: Expectations Regarding Use and Functionality From Health Care Providers

Peter Diem, Dominic Ehrmann, Derek Brandt, Michael Resl, Lutz Heinemann, Timm Roos, C Trümpy, Julia K. Mader, Bernhard Kulzer, Francisco Javier Ampudia-Blasco, Norbert Hermanns
article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: As part of the 2025 diabetes and technology (dt)-report, this study explored indications for use, barriers to adoption, and perceived functionality of smart pens. METHODS: An online survey conducted between November and December 2024 gathered responses from diabetes specialists and diabetes educators (health care professionals [HCPs]) in Germany (DE), Austria (AT), Switzerland (CH), and Spain (ES). Participants estimated the proportion of individuals with diabetes who would benefit from smart pens, rated the significance of specific functions, and evaluated barriers on 5-point scales. RESULTS: The survey included 1294 HCPs (69.2% DE, 9.7% AT, 7.0% CH; 14.1% ES). Current usage of smart pens is estimated at 4% to 15% for people with type 1 diabetes and 3% to 6% for those with type 2 diabetes. However, the indication rate is markedly higher, ranging from 51% to 73% for people with type 1 and up to 69% for those with type 2 with intensive insulin therapy. Most valued features included reminders for missed insulin doses (4.4 ± 0.7), bolus dose suggestions (4.1 ± 0.8), integration with continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) apps (4.1 ± 0.8), and temperature alerts (3.7 ± 1.0). Basal insulin suggestions were considered less important (3.3 ± 1.1). No significant differences were found between physicians and diabetes educators. Major barriers included preference for disposable pens (57%), limited device options (54%), and high cost (53%). Among DE respondents, concerns over cost reimbursement rose compared to the 2024 dt-report. CONCLUSION: Smart pens are underutilized compared to expectations. Cost and reimbursement remain the predominant barriers, while reminder functionality stands out as the most valued feature.

Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology
Johannes Kepler University of Linz (AT), Medical University of Graz (AT), German Diabetes Center Mergentheim (DE), Diabetes Australia (AU), Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valencia (ES), Convent Hospital of the Brothers of Saint John of God (AT), Forschungsinstitut der Diabetes Akademie Mergentheim (DE), Kantonsarchäologie (CH), Caritas-Krankenhaus Bad Mergentheim (DE), University of Bamberg (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.