Activity Patterns and Stress—Prognostic Factors for Pain Persistence and Disability in Acute Neck Pain: A 1‐Year Prospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND: Neck pain (NP) is a common global health problem, and persistent symptoms are often linked to psychological stress. How individuals respond to pain during daily activities is captured by activity patterns (eustress persistence, distress persistence, activity pacing and fear avoidance). These behavioural responses reflect different ways of managing pain-related activities and have been linked to variations in stress, pain intensity and disability. This study examined whether these factors serve as prognostic factors of pain and disability 1 year after the onset of acute NP. METHODS: In this observational cohort study, 125 participants were assessed at ≤ 1 month (T1), 3 months (T2), 6 months (T3) and 12 months (T4) after acute NP onset. Stress was measured objectively (hair cortisol) and subjectively (Stress and Coping Inventory). Activity patterns were assessed with the Avoidance-Endurance Fast Screen. Linear mixed-effects models were fitted using frequentist and Bayesian approaches. RESULTS: Pain intensity showed prognostic value at T1-T3 for higher pain intensity and disability at T4. Subjective stress was associated with higher pain intensity only at T3, with disability at all measured time points (T1-T3). Objective stress at T2 and T3 was associated with higher pain at T4, with disability only at T3. Among activity patterns, only distress persistence at T3 was associated with higher pain intensity at T4. DISCUSSION: Early pain intensity, longer-lasting stress and distress persistence were associated with symptom persistence, although effect sizes were small. These results may support patient-centred pain management. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT05468684 SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: This study identifies prognostic factors for pain and disability 1 year after acute neck pain onset by combining pain intensity, subjective stress, hair cortisol and activity patterns across multiple time points. Early pain intensity and persistent stress showed prognostic value for long-term outcomes. Importantly, distress persistence emerged as a prognostic activity pattern, extending the field beyond the predominant focus on fear avoidance. For physiotherapists, this highlights the value of monitoring pain, stress and behavioural responses to support informed, person-centred care.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Pain
Published
2026-05-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ejp.70303
Primary Topic
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Activity Patterns and Stress—Prognostic Factors for Pain Persistence and Disability in Acute Neck Pain: A 1‐Year Prospective Cohort Study

Leah Reicherzer, Jürgen Degenfellner, Rita Morf, Sabina Hotz‐Boendermaker
European Journal of Pain
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
article

Activity Patterns and Stress—Prognostic Factors for Pain Persistence and Disability in Acute Neck Pain: A 1‐Year Prospective Cohort Study

Leah Reicherzer, Jürgen Degenfellner, Rita Morf, Sabina Hotz‐Boendermaker
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Neck pain (NP) is a common global health problem, and persistent symptoms are often linked to psychological stress. How individuals respond to pain during daily activities is captured by activity patterns (eustress persistence, distress persistence, activity pacing and fear avoidance). These behavioural responses reflect different ways of managing pain-related activities and have been linked to variations in stress, pain intensity and disability. This study examined whether these factors serve as prognostic factors of pain and disability 1 year after the onset of acute NP. METHODS: In this observational cohort study, 125 participants were assessed at ≤ 1 month (T1), 3 months (T2), 6 months (T3) and 12 months (T4) after acute NP onset. Stress was measured objectively (hair cortisol) and subjectively (Stress and Coping Inventory). Activity patterns were assessed with the Avoidance-Endurance Fast Screen. Linear mixed-effects models were fitted using frequentist and Bayesian approaches. RESULTS: Pain intensity showed prognostic value at T1-T3 for higher pain intensity and disability at T4. Subjective stress was associated with higher pain intensity only at T3, with disability at all measured time points (T1-T3). Objective stress at T2 and T3 was associated with higher pain at T4, with disability only at T3. Among activity patterns, only distress persistence at T3 was associated with higher pain intensity at T4. DISCUSSION: Early pain intensity, longer-lasting stress and distress persistence were associated with symptom persistence, although effect sizes were small. These results may support patient-centred pain management. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT05468684 SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: This study identifies prognostic factors for pain and disability 1 year after acute neck pain onset by combining pain intensity, subjective stress, hair cortisol and activity patterns across multiple time points. Early pain intensity and persistent stress showed prognostic value for long-term outcomes. Importantly, distress persistence emerged as a prognostic activity pattern, extending the field beyond the predominant focus on fear avoidance. For physiotherapists, this highlights the value of monitoring pain, stress and behavioural responses to support informed, person-centred care.

European Journal of PainVol. 30(6)
ZHAW Zurich University of Applied Sciences (CH), University of Zurich (CH), Pain in Motion (BE), Zurich University of Teacher Education (CH), Medbase (CH)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.