Meta-Analysis of Distributional Preferences

Abstract We conduct a meta-analysis of distributional preferences, examining 297 estimates of sensitivity to inequality from 41 articles that structurally estimate the Fehr and Schmidt (1999) model. Our analysis indicates that individuals are inequality averse: mean sensitivity to disadvantageous and advantageous inequality are, respectively, 0.533 and 0.326. We also uncover systematic heterogeneity: aversion to advantageous (disadvantageous) inequality is smaller (larger) in strategic environments. Finally, we examine 98 estimates of altruism and attitude towards equity versus efficiency from 17 studies structurally estimating the Andreoni and Miller (2002) model. The representative individual displays Cobb–Douglas preferences with roughly 1/3 weight on others’ earnings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Economic Journal
Published
2026-05-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/ej/ueag068
Primary Topic
Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Meta-Analysis of Distributional Preferences

Massimiliano Pozzi, Salvatore Nunnari
The Economic Journal
Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
article

Meta-Analysis of Distributional Preferences

Massimiliano Pozzi, Salvatore Nunnari
article en

Abstract

Abstract We conduct a meta-analysis of distributional preferences, examining 297 estimates of sensitivity to inequality from 41 articles that structurally estimate the Fehr and Schmidt (1999) model. Our analysis indicates that individuals are inequality averse: mean sensitivity to disadvantageous and advantageous inequality are, respectively, 0.533 and 0.326. We also uncover systematic heterogeneity: aversion to advantageous (disadvantageous) inequality is smaller (larger) in strategic environments. Finally, we examine 98 estimates of altruism and attitude towards equity versus efficiency from 17 studies structurally estimating the Andreoni and Miller (2002) model. The representative individual displays Cobb–Douglas preferences with roughly 1/3 weight on others’ earnings.

The Economic Journal
University of Zurich (CH), Bocconi University (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Meta-Analysis of Distributional Preferences — Massimiliano Pozzi, Salvatore Nunnari · The Economic Journal (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS