Prevalence of xerostomia and hyposalivation in older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Oral health challenges in older individuals are often intensified by physiological and pathological changes associated with aging, leading to several oral conditions. Xerostomia and hyposalivation are common problems affecting quality of life. Therefore, this study aimed to assess the prevalence of xerostomia and hyposalivation in older individuals aged 60 years and above. METHODS: A comprehensive search strategy was conducted across four databases (MEDLINE/PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus and ProQuest) for articles published from inception to April 2026. Studies assessing xerostomia or hyposalivation in participants aged ≥ 60 years were included, while studies involving patients with systemic conditions known to cause xerostomia and/or hyposalivation, or those who had previously undergone radiotherapy, were excluded. The quality assessment was performed using a tool adapted from Hoy et al. The pooled prevalence of xerostomia and hyposalivation were estimated using random-effects models. Subgroup analyses were also conducted to identify sources of heterogeneity. RESULTS: The inclusion of 128 eligible publications comprising 174,698 participants reporting on the prevalence of xerostomia and hyposalivation. The included studies comprised a total of 170,803 individuals for xerostomia and 10,396 individuals for hyposalivation, with reported age ranges of 60-107 years and 60-103 years, respectively. The pooled prevalence of xerostomia (n = 119 study populations) was 32.4% (95% CI: 29.6%, 35.2%; I² = 99.3%), while that of hyposalivation (n = 32) was 33.0% (95% CI: 25.7%, 42.0%; I² = 98.6%). No evidence of publication bias was observed, and all sensitivity analyses yielded results consistent with the main analyses. Subgroup analyses did not reveal any apparent sources of heterogeneity. Most of the studies were assessed as having a high risk of bias for both xerostomia and hyposalivation. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of xerostomia and hyposalivation among older adults aged ≥ 60 years was approximately one-third, indicating a considerable burden in this population. However, the high degree of heterogeneity suggests substantial variability across studies, and the pooled estimates should therefore be interpreted with caution.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Oral Health
Published
2026-05-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-026-08579-x
Primary Topic
Salivary Gland Disorders and Functions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Prevalence of xerostomia and hyposalivation in older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Waranun Buajeeb, Nat Na-Ek, Kununya Pimolbutr, Naruemon Panpradit et al.
BMC Oral Health
Salivary Gland Disorders and Functions
article

Prevalence of xerostomia and hyposalivation in older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Waranun Buajeeb, Nat Na-Ek, Kununya Pimolbutr, Naruemon Panpradit, Kanyanuth Boonyoung
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Oral health challenges in older individuals are often intensified by physiological and pathological changes associated with aging, leading to several oral conditions. Xerostomia and hyposalivation are common problems affecting quality of life. Therefore, this study aimed to assess the prevalence of xerostomia and hyposalivation in older individuals aged 60 years and above. METHODS: A comprehensive search strategy was conducted across four databases (MEDLINE/PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus and ProQuest) for articles published from inception to April 2026. Studies assessing xerostomia or hyposalivation in participants aged ≥ 60 years were included, while studies involving patients with systemic conditions known to cause xerostomia and/or hyposalivation, or those who had previously undergone radiotherapy, were excluded. The quality assessment was performed using a tool adapted from Hoy et al. The pooled prevalence of xerostomia and hyposalivation were estimated using random-effects models. Subgroup analyses were also conducted to identify sources of heterogeneity. RESULTS: The inclusion of 128 eligible publications comprising 174,698 participants reporting on the prevalence of xerostomia and hyposalivation. The included studies comprised a total of 170,803 individuals for xerostomia and 10,396 individuals for hyposalivation, with reported age ranges of 60-107 years and 60-103 years, respectively. The pooled prevalence of xerostomia (n = 119 study populations) was 32.4% (95% CI: 29.6%, 35.2%; I² = 99.3%), while that of hyposalivation (n = 32) was 33.0% (95% CI: 25.7%, 42.0%; I² = 98.6%). No evidence of publication bias was observed, and all sensitivity analyses yielded results consistent with the main analyses. Subgroup analyses did not reveal any apparent sources of heterogeneity. Most of the studies were assessed as having a high risk of bias for both xerostomia and hyposalivation. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of xerostomia and hyposalivation among older adults aged ≥ 60 years was approximately one-third, indicating a considerable burden in this population. However, the high degree of heterogeneity suggests substantial variability across studies, and the pooled estimates should therefore be interpreted with caution.

BMC Oral Health
Mahidol University (TH), University of Phayao (TH)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Salivary Gland Disorders and Functions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.