Informal adaptations in restructuring supply chains: Worker responses to geopolitical decoupling

This article examines how geopolitical tensions reshape informal economic activities through supply chain restructuring. Drawing on 60 interviews with workers and systematic analysis of 47 policy documents across Greece, Turkey, and Bulgaria, the research develops the concept of “geopolitical informality,” informal economic adaptations triggered by interstate competition rather than domestic factors. Triangulating interview data with union estimates and corporate reports, the research indicates that approximately 38% to 52% of displaced workers transition to informal employment, creating a “formalization paradox” where states assert control over strategic sectors while tolerating informality for competitive flexibility. Document analysis exposes systematic “strategic silence” in policy frameworks that celebrate formal job creation while ignoring the informal foundations enabling supply chain restructuring. Workers demonstrate significant agency through cross-border networks, skill-sharing cooperatives, and hybrid formal–informal income strategies. The research challenges assumptions about formalization and development, revealing informality as a structural feature of contemporary geopolitical capitalism requiring new theoretical frameworks and policy approaches that protect worker welfare while navigating strategic competition.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Industrial Relations
Published
2026-05-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/00221856261454714
Primary Topic
Global trade, sustainability, and social impact
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Informal adaptations in restructuring supply chains: Worker responses to geopolitical decoupling

Ceyhun Elgin
Journal of Industrial Relations
Global trade, sustainability, and social impact
article

Informal adaptations in restructuring supply chains: Worker responses to geopolitical decoupling

Ceyhun Elgin
article en

Abstract

This article examines how geopolitical tensions reshape informal economic activities through supply chain restructuring. Drawing on 60 interviews with workers and systematic analysis of 47 policy documents across Greece, Turkey, and Bulgaria, the research develops the concept of “geopolitical informality,” informal economic adaptations triggered by interstate competition rather than domestic factors. Triangulating interview data with union estimates and corporate reports, the research indicates that approximately 38% to 52% of displaced workers transition to informal employment, creating a “formalization paradox” where states assert control over strategic sectors while tolerating informality for competitive flexibility. Document analysis exposes systematic “strategic silence” in policy frameworks that celebrate formal job creation while ignoring the informal foundations enabling supply chain restructuring. Workers demonstrate significant agency through cross-border networks, skill-sharing cooperatives, and hybrid formal–informal income strategies. The research challenges assumptions about formalization and development, revealing informality as a structural feature of contemporary geopolitical capitalism requiring new theoretical frameworks and policy approaches that protect worker welfare while navigating strategic competition.

Journal of Industrial Relations
Boğaziçi University (TR)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Global trade, sustainability, and social impact
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.