Nature of the Firm, Relations of Exchange, and Objective of Production: A Field-Based Study of Micro Firms in India

This article analyses the nature of firms, relations of exchange, and the objective of production of micro firms engaged in two types of manufacturing activities operating across West Bengal, India: handloom weaving and forging fabrication. Our primary data-based analysis shows that while the handloom is an entirely household labor-based activity, forging fabrication significantly uses hired labor. However, these micro firms are intrinsically non-capitalistic, having collaboration amongst the intra-firm actors—with a few exceptions. In the market, there are intermediaries, especially in the handloom industry, whereas in forging fabrication, firms operate independently. We find that while hierarchy does exist between firms and market agents, collaborative arrangements are also present, regardless of the pattern of market linkages. Despite the constraint of limited surplus needed for the firm’s growth, the willingness for expansion is evident. However, barring a few micro firms exhibiting tendencies toward accumulation, the majority produce to improve their living conditions, a typical characteristic of the “need economy”. JEL Codes: D22, L22, 012, 017, P00

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Review of Radical Political Economics
Published
2026-05-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/04866134261421643
Primary Topic
Global trade, sustainability, and social impact
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Nature of the Firm, Relations of Exchange, and Objective of Production: A Field-Based Study of Micro Firms in India

Saumya Chakrabarti, HIMADRIJA CHAKRABORTY, Rahul Pal
Review of Radical Political Economics
Global trade, sustainability, and social impact
article

Nature of the Firm, Relations of Exchange, and Objective of Production: A Field-Based Study of Micro Firms in India

Saumya Chakrabarti, HIMADRIJA CHAKRABORTY, Rahul Pal
article en

Abstract

This article analyses the nature of firms, relations of exchange, and the objective of production of micro firms engaged in two types of manufacturing activities operating across West Bengal, India: handloom weaving and forging fabrication. Our primary data-based analysis shows that while the handloom is an entirely household labor-based activity, forging fabrication significantly uses hired labor. However, these micro firms are intrinsically non-capitalistic, having collaboration amongst the intra-firm actors—with a few exceptions. In the market, there are intermediaries, especially in the handloom industry, whereas in forging fabrication, firms operate independently. We find that while hierarchy does exist between firms and market agents, collaborative arrangements are also present, regardless of the pattern of market linkages. Despite the constraint of limited surplus needed for the firm’s growth, the willingness for expansion is evident. However, barring a few micro firms exhibiting tendencies toward accumulation, the majority produce to improve their living conditions, a typical characteristic of the “need economy”. JEL Codes: D22, L22, 012, 017, P00

Review of Radical Political Economics
Visva-Bharati University (IN)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Global trade, sustainability, and social impact
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Nature of the Firm, Relations of Exchange, and Objective of Production: A Field-Based Study of Micro Firms in India — Saumya Chakrabarti, HIMADRIJA CHAKRABORTY, et al. · Review of Radical Political Economics (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS