A comparative analysis of soft power strategies of India and China in Africa

This paper investigates the comparative effectiveness of India and China's soft power strategies in Africa, focusing on the period from the early 2000s to 2023. While both countries have leveraged soft power to enhance their geopolitical influence in Africa, their strategies differ significantly. China’s soft power approach is primarily economic, centered around large-scale infrastructure projects and investments under the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI), which have rapidly expanded its influence. In contrast, India’s soft power is based on cultural diplomacy, democratic values, and capacity-building initiatives, positioning it as a partner focused on sustainable development and mutual growth. Despite the growing body of research on soft power, few studies provide a comparative analysis of how these two emerging powers utilize their respective strategies within Africa’s geopolitical landscape. This paper addresses this gap by evaluating the strengths and limitations of each approach. The study contributes new insights by demonstrating how China’s economic-driven strategy has raised concerns over debt dependency, while India’s people-centered approach has fostered long-term partnerships, despite its relatively smaller economic footprint. The findings underscore the importance of adapting soft power strategies to the unique needs and aspirations of African nations, suggesting that both India and China can enhance their influence through more inclusive and sustainable methods.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Discover Global Society
Published
2026-05-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s44282-026-00338-1
Primary Topic
International Development and Aid
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A comparative analysis of soft power strategies of India and China in Africa

Neeraj Singh Manhas, Tilak Raj Sharma, Jai Bhawani Singh
Discover Global Society
International Development and Aid
article

A comparative analysis of soft power strategies of India and China in Africa

Neeraj Singh Manhas, Tilak Raj Sharma, Jai Bhawani Singh
article en

Abstract

This paper investigates the comparative effectiveness of India and China's soft power strategies in Africa, focusing on the period from the early 2000s to 2023. While both countries have leveraged soft power to enhance their geopolitical influence in Africa, their strategies differ significantly. China’s soft power approach is primarily economic, centered around large-scale infrastructure projects and investments under the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI), which have rapidly expanded its influence. In contrast, India’s soft power is based on cultural diplomacy, democratic values, and capacity-building initiatives, positioning it as a partner focused on sustainable development and mutual growth. Despite the growing body of research on soft power, few studies provide a comparative analysis of how these two emerging powers utilize their respective strategies within Africa’s geopolitical landscape. This paper addresses this gap by evaluating the strengths and limitations of each approach. The study contributes new insights by demonstrating how China’s economic-driven strategy has raised concerns over debt dependency, while India’s people-centered approach has fostered long-term partnerships, despite its relatively smaller economic footprint. The findings underscore the importance of adapting soft power strategies to the unique needs and aspirations of African nations, suggesting that both India and China can enhance their influence through more inclusive and sustainable methods.

Discover Global SocietyVol. 4(1)
Maharaja Sayajirao University of Baroda (IN), University of Jammu (IN), Central University of Jammu (IN)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
International Development and Aid
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.