Machine learning‐assisted clone selection for intensified cell culture processes

Intensified fed-batch processes are becoming increasingly prevalent among biomanufacturers due to their superior space-time yields relative to traditional, non-intensified fed-batch processes. However, the shift towards intensified manufacturing has unexpectedly made optimal clone selection more challenging. Clone selection, traditionally an empirical screening of candidates on the basis of productivity, has been complicated by the observation that clonal productivity rankings can vary substantially between intensified and non-intensified processes. In the absence of a small-scale intensified empirical screen, clones destined for intensified manufacturing are selected based on their performance in the non-intensified process. This mismatch risks selection of suboptimal clones, representing a missed opportunity to generate additional product at no extra cost. This study presents a machine learning approach to improve clone selection for intensified processes by predicting and ranking clonal productivity. Models were trained on non-intensified clone performance data routinely collected during cell line development to facilitate seamless integration into existing capabilities. To evaluate generalizability and simulate real-world application, independent clone panels expressing two distinct monoclonal antibodies were withheld from model training and used in comparative testing against the legacy clone selection method. The ranking model identified the most productive clone of those expressing the first mAb, representing a 68.5% higher titer than the clone selected by the legacy method. For the second mAb, the ranking model identified the second most productive clone, resulting in a marginally lower titer. These results demonstrate the potential of machine learning models as practical tools for improving the selection of high productivity clones in intensified bioprocessing.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Biotechnology Progress
Published
2026-05-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/btpr.88519
Primary Topic
Viral Infectious Diseases and Gene Expression in Insects
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Machine learning‐assisted clone selection for intensified cell culture processes

Julia Armstrong, Christian Siltanen, Ariel Atchley, John Schmitt et al.
Biotechnology Progress
Viral Infectious Diseases and Gene Expression in Insects
article

Machine learning‐assisted clone selection for intensified cell culture processes

Julia Armstrong, Christian Siltanen, Ariel Atchley, John Schmitt, Brandon Downey, Shannon Hendrick, Nicolas Wolnick
article en

Abstract

Intensified fed-batch processes are becoming increasingly prevalent among biomanufacturers due to their superior space-time yields relative to traditional, non-intensified fed-batch processes. However, the shift towards intensified manufacturing has unexpectedly made optimal clone selection more challenging. Clone selection, traditionally an empirical screening of candidates on the basis of productivity, has been complicated by the observation that clonal productivity rankings can vary substantially between intensified and non-intensified processes. In the absence of a small-scale intensified empirical screen, clones destined for intensified manufacturing are selected based on their performance in the non-intensified process. This mismatch risks selection of suboptimal clones, representing a missed opportunity to generate additional product at no extra cost. This study presents a machine learning approach to improve clone selection for intensified processes by predicting and ranking clonal productivity. Models were trained on non-intensified clone performance data routinely collected during cell line development to facilitate seamless integration into existing capabilities. To evaluate generalizability and simulate real-world application, independent clone panels expressing two distinct monoclonal antibodies were withheld from model training and used in comparative testing against the legacy clone selection method. The ranking model identified the most productive clone of those expressing the first mAb, representing a 68.5% higher titer than the clone selected by the legacy method. For the second mAb, the ranking model identified the second most productive clone, resulting in a marginally lower titer. These results demonstrate the potential of machine learning models as practical tools for improving the selection of high productivity clones in intensified bioprocessing.

Biotechnology Progress
Central Oregon Community College (US)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Viral Infectious Diseases and Gene Expression in Insects
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.