Impact of salpingectomy on ovarian response to hormonal stimulation in in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles

BACKGROUND: The coagulation-section of the mesosalpinx during the salpingectomy can lead to injuries on the ovarian vascularization, and thus to the ovarian response to hormonal stimulation. Does salpingectomy affect negatively the follicles recruitment in in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles? We conducted a monocentric retrospective case-control study including all patients undergoing IVF cycle with a history of unilateral salpingectomy for hydrosalpinx (HSX) or ectopic pregnancy (EP) (Group S), and each of them was matched to two controls (Group C) treated in the same month, according to their: age, AMH level, and BMI. The difference in follicle recruitment the day of trigger between the two ovaries of each patient was calculated. The primary endpoint was the difference between the two groups in the total number of follicles with a diameter ≥ 13 mm. Secondary endpoints were the difference between groups regarding the number of (1) mature follicles (diameter ≥ 16 mm) and intermediate follicles [13.0-15.5 mm]; (2) cycle cancellation rate; and (3) total number of oocytes and mature oocytes retrieved. The same comparisons were also carried out on subgroups according to the indication for salpingectomy (HSX or EP). RESULTS: 114 and 228 patients were included in Groups S and C, respectively. Compared to Group C, Group S patients showed a greater difference between ovaries in the total number of follicles recruited (0.76 ± 3.95 vs. -0.18 ± 3.37, p = 0.002) and in the number of mature follicles (0.51 ± 2.91 vs. -0.14 ± 2.85, p = 0.05). No significant differences were observed for the number of intermediate follicles, or the total number of oocytes or mature oocytes retrieved. However, the cycle cancellation rate was significantly higher in Group S (13.2% vs. 3.1%, p < 0.001). Subgroup analysis revealed no significant differences between each of the Group S subgroups (HSX and EP) regarding follicular recruitment. Nevertheless, both subgroups had significantly more cancelled cycles compared with their respective controls (HSX: 12.5% vs. 4.4%, p < 0.001; EP: 8.8% vs. 1.8%, p = 0.004). CONCLUSION: Salpingectomy has a negative impact on follicles recruitement in IVF cycles. This risk must be taken into consideration when scheduling this surgery.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Ovarian Research
Published
2026-05-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13048-026-02114-w
Primary Topic
Gynecological conditions and treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impact of salpingectomy on ovarian response to hormonal stimulation in in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles

Stéphane Sanchez, Achraf Benammar, Rossana Cicinelli, Yohan Benchimol et al.
Journal of Ovarian Research
Gynecological conditions and treatments
article

Impact of salpingectomy on ovarian response to hormonal stimulation in in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles

Stéphane Sanchez, Achraf Benammar, Rossana Cicinelli, Yohan Benchimol, Jean-Marc Ayoubi, Catherine Racowsky
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The coagulation-section of the mesosalpinx during the salpingectomy can lead to injuries on the ovarian vascularization, and thus to the ovarian response to hormonal stimulation. Does salpingectomy affect negatively the follicles recruitment in in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles? We conducted a monocentric retrospective case-control study including all patients undergoing IVF cycle with a history of unilateral salpingectomy for hydrosalpinx (HSX) or ectopic pregnancy (EP) (Group S), and each of them was matched to two controls (Group C) treated in the same month, according to their: age, AMH level, and BMI. The difference in follicle recruitment the day of trigger between the two ovaries of each patient was calculated. The primary endpoint was the difference between the two groups in the total number of follicles with a diameter ≥ 13 mm. Secondary endpoints were the difference between groups regarding the number of (1) mature follicles (diameter ≥ 16 mm) and intermediate follicles [13.0-15.5 mm]; (2) cycle cancellation rate; and (3) total number of oocytes and mature oocytes retrieved. The same comparisons were also carried out on subgroups according to the indication for salpingectomy (HSX or EP). RESULTS: 114 and 228 patients were included in Groups S and C, respectively. Compared to Group C, Group S patients showed a greater difference between ovaries in the total number of follicles recruited (0.76 ± 3.95 vs. -0.18 ± 3.37, p = 0.002) and in the number of mature follicles (0.51 ± 2.91 vs. -0.14 ± 2.85, p = 0.05). No significant differences were observed for the number of intermediate follicles, or the total number of oocytes or mature oocytes retrieved. However, the cycle cancellation rate was significantly higher in Group S (13.2% vs. 3.1%, p < 0.001). Subgroup analysis revealed no significant differences between each of the Group S subgroups (HSX and EP) regarding follicular recruitment. Nevertheless, both subgroups had significantly more cancelled cycles compared with their respective controls (HSX: 12.5% vs. 4.4%, p < 0.001; EP: 8.8% vs. 1.8%, p = 0.004). CONCLUSION: Salpingectomy has a negative impact on follicles recruitement in IVF cycles. This risk must be taken into consideration when scheduling this surgery.

Journal of Ovarian Research
École Nationale Vétérinaire d'Alfort (FR), Université de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines (FR), Université Paris-Saclay (FR), Institut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement (FR), Hôpital Foch (FR)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Gynecological conditions and treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.