Prevalence, Risk Factors, and Mortality of Venovenous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Escalation in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: A Multicenter Cohort Study From the Chinese Society of Extracorporeal Life Support Registry

OBJECTIVES: Patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) undergoing venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) may experience severe cardiogenic shock, necessitating ECMO mode "escalation" for cardiopulmonary co-support. There is a paucity of data regarding the prevalence, risk factors, and mortality of venovenous ECMO escalation. We aimed to conduct a large study to address this issue. DESIGN: A multicenter cohort study. SETTING: The analysis was conducted based on data from the Chinese Society of Extracorporeal Life Support registry, a nationwide voluntary platform capturing clinical information of patients receiving ECMO support. Data were collected from 112 centers across China between January 2017 and December 2023. PATIENTS: Eligible participants included adult patients with ARDS receiving venovenous ECMO, excluding pregnant patients and those with missing data on escalation. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Of the 3333 patients on venovenous ECMO, 157 (4.7%) underwent escalation to venoarterial ECMO (n = 41), veno-arterial-venous (VAV) ECMO (n = 68), and veno-veno-arterial (VVA) ECMO (n = 48). Several characteristics, including hospital's annual venovenous ECMO volume (hospitals > 15 cases per year vs. those < 6 cases per year; odds ratio [OR], 0.596; 95% CI, 0.382-0.930), were associated with the occurrence of escalation. The overall in-hospital mortality was 47.9%. Both escalation and lower hospital's venovenous ECMO volume were independently associated with an increased mortality. Compared with patients escalated to VVA ECMO, those escalated to venoarterial ECMO had a significantly higher survival rate (OR, 3.444; 95% CI, 1.046-11.342), whereas those escalated to VAV ECMO did not. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, 4.7% of ARDS patients with venovenous ECMO underwent a mode escalation. Escalation was independently associated with higher in-hospital mortality, an association that may be partially confounded by low hospital's venovenous ECMO volume. Among the modes after escalation, venoarterial ECMO was associated with a significantly higher survival rate. These findings require validation by further prospective multicenter studies to guide decision-making for ARDS patients requiring ECMO support.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Critical Care Medicine
Published
2026-05-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/ccm.0000000000007177
Primary Topic
Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Prevalence, Risk Factors, and Mortality of Venovenous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Escalation in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: A Multicenter Cohort Study From the Chinese Society of Extracorporeal Life Support Registry

Xingxing Liu, H Wang, Sicong Ma, Bo Huang et al.
Critical Care Medicine
Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
article

Prevalence, Risk Factors, and Mortality of Venovenous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Escalation in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: A Multicenter Cohort Study From the Chinese Society of Extracorporeal Life Support Registry

Xingxing Liu, H Wang, Sicong Ma, Bo Huang, Zhanguo Liu, Xh Hou, Haixiu Xie, Z R Cen, Zhongtao Du, Jing Cai, Jie He, Yihan Pan
article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) undergoing venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) may experience severe cardiogenic shock, necessitating ECMO mode "escalation" for cardiopulmonary co-support. There is a paucity of data regarding the prevalence, risk factors, and mortality of venovenous ECMO escalation. We aimed to conduct a large study to address this issue. DESIGN: A multicenter cohort study. SETTING: The analysis was conducted based on data from the Chinese Society of Extracorporeal Life Support registry, a nationwide voluntary platform capturing clinical information of patients receiving ECMO support. Data were collected from 112 centers across China between January 2017 and December 2023. PATIENTS: Eligible participants included adult patients with ARDS receiving venovenous ECMO, excluding pregnant patients and those with missing data on escalation. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Of the 3333 patients on venovenous ECMO, 157 (4.7%) underwent escalation to venoarterial ECMO (n = 41), veno-arterial-venous (VAV) ECMO (n = 68), and veno-veno-arterial (VVA) ECMO (n = 48). Several characteristics, including hospital's annual venovenous ECMO volume (hospitals > 15 cases per year vs. those < 6 cases per year; odds ratio [OR], 0.596; 95% CI, 0.382-0.930), were associated with the occurrence of escalation. The overall in-hospital mortality was 47.9%. Both escalation and lower hospital's venovenous ECMO volume were independently associated with an increased mortality. Compared with patients escalated to VVA ECMO, those escalated to venoarterial ECMO had a significantly higher survival rate (OR, 3.444; 95% CI, 1.046-11.342), whereas those escalated to VAV ECMO did not. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, 4.7% of ARDS patients with venovenous ECMO underwent a mode escalation. Escalation was independently associated with higher in-hospital mortality, an association that may be partially confounded by low hospital's venovenous ECMO volume. Among the modes after escalation, venoarterial ECMO was associated with a significantly higher survival rate. These findings require validation by further prospective multicenter studies to guide decision-making for ARDS patients requiring ECMO support.

Critical Care Medicine
Capital Medical University (CN), Beijing Anzhen Hospital (CN), Zhujiang Hospital (CN), Southern Medical University (CN)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.