Comparative Biocontrol Efficacy and Mechanisms of Indirect and Direct Application Methods Against Leaf Spot Caused by Pseudomonas syringae pv. aptata in Sugar Beet

Using beneficial bacteria from the plant microbiome to combat pathogens is an environmentally friendly strategy for biological control. Although significant progress has been made in characterizing microorganisms with biocontrol potential, the optimal methods for applying such biological preparations to achieve maximum effectiveness against plant pathogens remain insufficiently defined. Our goal was to select rhizobacteria from the sugar beet microbiome and analyze their biocontrol capacity in both indirect and direct applications to protect the plant from Pseudomonas syringae pv. aptata P21. The methodological approach differed: indirect application involved seed priming with selected strains, Bacillus safensis MRh275, B. pseudomycoides JRh226, Stenotrophomonas maltophilia JRh266, or the T2 consortium (MRh275 and JRh266), while direct application involved simultaneous treatment of both the pathogen and the biocontrol strain. Although the direct approach resulted in a greater reduction in lesions and a lower concentration of H2O2, the indirect approach showed higher activity of peroxidase and superoxide dismutase as antioxidant enzymes, as well as phenylalanine ammonia-lyase, which is involved in the phenylpropanoid pathway and plant defense mechanisms. Infected plants showed higher expression of NPR1, MYC2, and LOX defense-related genes only under indirect biocontrol with all three strains, except in the T2 application. The T2 consortium performed best in direct biocontrol, where it most effectively reduced lesions. Since encounters between plants and pathogens cannot be accurately predicted, and the application of biological preparations should be easy and accessible for farmers, this study highlights the use of indirect biocontrol through seed priming to enhance the plant’s intrinsic defense capacity.