Endoscopic versus surgical myotomy for achalasia and its impact of future esophageal cancer incidence: a Markov analysis based on a systematic review and meta-analysis of literature

Introduction: Achalasia increases the risk of esophageal cancer due to chronic food stasis and inflammation. Laparoscopic Heller’s myotomy (LHM) with partial fundoplication and peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) have shown similar outcomes in resolving dysphagia, but POEM had higher postoperative gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). GERD, however, increases the risk of esophageal adenocarcinoma. We aim to determine, via a probabilistic approach, the likelihood of esophageal cancer in patients who underwent either LHM or POEM as the initial myotomy of choice for achalasia. Methods: Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies published from 2015 to 2024 reporting outcomes of LHM or POEM, including revisional procedures and cancer incidence, were performed. A Markov decision tree model was developed, with input probabilities based on the systematic review. Primary outcome was probability of esophageal cancer. Results: Twenty-six studies were included into a five-step Markov decision tree. Meta-analyses revealed that POEM did not differ from LHM in dysphagia resolution (RR 1.00, 95% CI: 0.91–1.11) and did not significantly increase post-operative esophagitis (RR 2.51, 95% CI: 0.68–9.26). Re-operative POEM was superior to LHM (OR 3.39, 95% 1.04–11.05) in patients with refractory or recurrent dysphagia patients. Achalasia significantly increases the risk of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Based on 10 000 simulations over a 10-year period, primary LHM or POEM did not significantly impact esophageal cancer development (1.9% vs 1.5%, P = 0.089), though POEM consistently resulted in more esophagitis (42.3% vs 16.0%, P < 0.001). Refractory or recurrent achalasia had the highest input probability of esophageal cancer. Conclusion: The overall likelihood of esophageal cancer after LHM or POEM was similar, likely due to the low, albeit elevated, risk of esophageal cancer in achalasia. However, the significantly higher post-procedural esophagitis with POEM, which may necessitate long-term management and surveillance, must also be considered when considering the initial myotomy of choice. Re-operative POEM should be considered in patients with refractory or recurrent dysphagia after treatment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Surgery
Published
2026-05-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/js9.0000000000005349
Primary Topic
Gastroesophageal reflux and treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Endoscopic versus surgical myotomy for achalasia and its impact of future esophageal cancer incidence: a Markov analysis based on a systematic review and meta-analysis of literature

Baldwin Po Man Yeung, Nan Guang Tan, James Weiquan Li, Koy Min Chue et al.
International Journal of Surgery
Gastroesophageal reflux and treatments
article

Endoscopic versus surgical myotomy for achalasia and its impact of future esophageal cancer incidence: a Markov analysis based on a systematic review and meta-analysis of literature

Baldwin Po Man Yeung, Nan Guang Tan, James Weiquan Li, Koy Min Chue, Clarence Kwan, Jeremy Tan, Mang Yik Foo, Lester Wei Lin Ong, Wai Keong Wong
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Achalasia increases the risk of esophageal cancer due to chronic food stasis and inflammation. Laparoscopic Heller’s myotomy (LHM) with partial fundoplication and peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) have shown similar outcomes in resolving dysphagia, but POEM had higher postoperative gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). GERD, however, increases the risk of esophageal adenocarcinoma. We aim to determine, via a probabilistic approach, the likelihood of esophageal cancer in patients who underwent either LHM or POEM as the initial myotomy of choice for achalasia. Methods: Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies published from 2015 to 2024 reporting outcomes of LHM or POEM, including revisional procedures and cancer incidence, were performed. A Markov decision tree model was developed, with input probabilities based on the systematic review. Primary outcome was probability of esophageal cancer. Results: Twenty-six studies were included into a five-step Markov decision tree. Meta-analyses revealed that POEM did not differ from LHM in dysphagia resolution (RR 1.00, 95% CI: 0.91–1.11) and did not significantly increase post-operative esophagitis (RR 2.51, 95% CI: 0.68–9.26). Re-operative POEM was superior to LHM (OR 3.39, 95% 1.04–11.05) in patients with refractory or recurrent dysphagia patients. Achalasia significantly increases the risk of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Based on 10 000 simulations over a 10-year period, primary LHM or POEM did not significantly impact esophageal cancer development (1.9% vs 1.5%, P = 0.089), though POEM consistently resulted in more esophagitis (42.3% vs 16.0%, P < 0.001). Refractory or recurrent achalasia had the highest input probability of esophageal cancer. Conclusion: The overall likelihood of esophageal cancer after LHM or POEM was similar, likely due to the low, albeit elevated, risk of esophageal cancer in achalasia. However, the significantly higher post-procedural esophagitis with POEM, which may necessitate long-term management and surveillance, must also be considered when considering the initial myotomy of choice. Re-operative POEM should be considered in patients with refractory or recurrent dysphagia after treatment.

International Journal of Surgery
Nanyang Technological University (SG), Singapore General Hospital (SG), SingHealth Duke-NUS Academic Medical Centre (SG), Sengkang General Hospital (SG)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Gastroesophageal reflux and treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.