Authority Check: A Diagnostic Framework for Judgment, Delegation, and Approval in AI-Assisted Generation

This paper proposes Authority Check (AC), a diagnostic framework for examining judgment, delegation, and approval processes in AI-assisted generation. Unlike approaches that evaluate only final outputs, Authority Check focuses on how judgments are formed, delegated, supplemented by AI, approved by humans, and connected to subsequent improvement cycles. The paper organizes the scope of Authority Check into the final artifact, generation process, and improvement process, and proposes a protocol beginning with Problem Definition, SD structure fixation, LCQ examination, judgment tracing, delegation analysis, approval management, recovery point identification, and next-Plan revision. It also identifies representative Failure Patterns such as Problem Definition Failure, AI-Supplemented Judgment Drift, Delegation and Layer Crossing Failure, Approval Failure, and Recovery Failure. Authority Check is positioned not as a system for replacing human expertise, but as a framework for preserving human judgment authority while using AI-assisted generation systems.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-05-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20336718
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

Authority Check: A Diagnostic Framework for Judgment, Delegation, and Approval in AI-Assisted Generation

Takuma Yoshida
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
preprint

Authority Check: A Diagnostic Framework for Judgment, Delegation, and Approval in AI-Assisted Generation

Takuma Yoshida
preprint en

Abstract

This paper proposes Authority Check (AC), a diagnostic framework for examining judgment, delegation, and approval processes in AI-assisted generation. Unlike approaches that evaluate only final outputs, Authority Check focuses on how judgments are formed, delegated, supplemented by AI, approved by humans, and connected to subsequent improvement cycles. The paper organizes the scope of Authority Check into the final artifact, generation process, and improvement process, and proposes a protocol beginning with Problem Definition, SD structure fixation, LCQ examination, judgment tracing, delegation analysis, approval management, recovery point identification, and next-Plan revision. It also identifies representative Failure Patterns such as Problem Definition Failure, AI-Supplemented Judgment Drift, Delegation and Layer Crossing Failure, Approval Failure, and Recovery Failure. Authority Check is positioned not as a system for replacing human expertise, but as a framework for preserving human judgment authority while using AI-assisted generation systems.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Authority Check: A Diagnostic Framework for Judgment, Delegation, and Approval in AI-Assisted Generation — Takuma Yoshida · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS